Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-certstore-http-01.txt

["Housley, Russ" <rhousley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Gutmann:

I would prefer to maintain alignment with RFC 2585.  The use of SEQUENCE OF 
would be fewer bit on the wire, but it would also require the specification 
of another MIME type for the transfer of certificates.

Russ

> >. "If more than one certificate matches a query, it MUST be returned as a
> >multipart response." I assume you mean multipart/mixed? I would
definitely
> >prefer a SEQUENCE of certificates.
>
>Does anyone else have any thoughts on this?  The comments in the draft on
>SEQUENCE OF are:
>
>   This has the advantage that it takes a lot less code to parse, OTOH it 
> may be
>   harder to produce if what you're using is a web-enabled database, which
is
>   what most of them are.




============================================================================
================
This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express
prior written permission of the sender.  If 
you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, disclose to any
third party or use the contents, attachments or 
information in any way, Please delete all copies of the e-mail and the
attachment(s), if any and notify the sender. 
Thank You.
============================================================================
================