Re: Cautionary Period Straw Poll

[Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>]

Santosh,

> I believe that DPV protocols developed by the PKIX working group ought not
> include support for a cautionary period.
 
> I believe this because I am.

Quite an interresting technical argument.  :-)

Denis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Housley, Russ [mailto:rhousley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Cautionary Period Straw Poll
> 
>  From the previous thread (which seems to have died down), I think that
> everyone understands the Cautionary Period concept.  I am trying to
> determine whether there is a constituency for Cautionary Period in DPV.
> 
> I would like people that have an opinion to vote by sending a message to
> the list.  The message should be structured as follows:
> 
>            To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
>            Subject: RE: Cautionary Period Straw Poll
> 
>            I believe that DPV protocols developed by the PKIX working
> group
>            [ought to | ought not] include support for a cautionary period.
> 
>            [I belive this because ...]
> 
> If you feel the need to reply to the rationale posted by  someone, please
> make that posting on the other thread.  Please do not clutter the straw
> poll voting with a debate.
> 
> Thanks for your assistance and cooperation,
>    Russ