Re: Cautionary Period Straw Poll

[Alfonso De Gregorio <agregorio@xxxxxxx>]

I  believe that DPV protocols developed by the PKIX working group
ought to include support for a cautionary period.

alfonso


On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:05:22PM -0500, Housley, Russ wrote:
> 
>  From the previous thread (which seems to have died down), I think that 
> everyone understands the Cautionary Period concept.  I am trying to 
> determine whether there is a constituency for Cautionary Period in DPV.
> 
> I would like people that have an opinion to vote by sending a message to 
> the list.  The message should be structured as follows:
> 
>            To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
>            Subject: RE: Cautionary Period Straw Poll
> 
>            I believe that DPV protocols developed by the PKIX working group
>            [ought to | ought not] include support for a cautionary period.
> 
>            [I belive this because ...]
> 
> If you feel the need to reply to the rationale posted by  someone, please 
> make that posting on the other thread.  Please do not clutter the straw 
> poll voting with a debate.
> 
> Thanks for your assistance and cooperation,
>    Russ