Re: DPD/DPV reqmts strawpoll

[jim <jimhei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Since checks and balances are a healthy thing, I would be very opposed to taking
any action against Todd.  I think he has been bringing up valid points that need
to be considered before any action can or should be taken.  The open dialog is
healthy, but I do wish that all would refrain from making or taking things
personally.
Jim

todd glassey wrote:

> Steve you chair is not a throne. really its not.
>
> T.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen Kent" <kent@xxxxxxx>
> To: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Peter Sylvester" <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>; <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>;
> <tim@xxxxxxxx>; "vint cerf" <vinton.g.cerf@xxxxxxxx>; <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: DPD/DPV reqmts strawpoll
>
> > At 5:23 AM -0800 3/18/02, todd glassey wrote:
> > >I would hate to think that the WG Chairs used any kind of Email
> Blacklisting
> > >or other Blacklisting processes - that would be blatantly a problem for
> the
> > >ruling class here.
> > >
> > >Todd
> > >
> >
> > Two observations:
> >
> > First, as Peter later noted, he was making a tongue in cheek comment
> > re blacklisting.
> >
> > Second, if you were more familiar with IETF history you might be
> > aware of rare instances where individuals have been banned from
> > mailing lists due to persistent, egregious behavior. Your behavior
> > has not yet reached a point where such measures are warranted, but
> > you're working on it.
> >
> > Steve
> >