[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements

To: "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:42:35 -0400
Cc: <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Anders,

I'm sure we all appreciate your efforts to save the rest of us from wasting our time on DPV/DPD. Your message seems to indicate that you don't object to the rest of us continuing to work on this if we see fit.

Thanks,

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Deciding on how to proceed with DPD/DPV Was: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
  - From: Anders Rundgren

References:
- Re: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
  - From: Anders Rundgren

Prev by Date: Re: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
Next by Date: Deciding on how to proceed with DPD/DPV Was: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
Previous by thread: Re: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
Next by thread: Deciding on how to proceed with DPD/DPV Was: WG Last Call CLOSED: DPD/DPV Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread