Re: Objections Raised by the IESG on the Roadmap document

["Sean P. Turner" <turners@xxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

Just to make sure - it's just the "STATUS: *" lines in section 4?

spt

"Jeffrey I. Schiller" wrote:

> This is my fault, as I should have caught this before it got to the
> IESG.
>
> The document contains a lot of status information on the various
> Internet Drafts and RFCs that make up the PKIX Document set.
>
> Well, it is considered inappropriate for information that is as
> dynamic as document status to be enshrined in an RFC.
>
> I suggest that we remove the status text from the document and
> resubmit. The IESG recommends that the status information be placed on
> a webpage, which can be linked from the IESG Charter Page. Of course
> we would need someone to volunteer to keep that information up to
> date.
>
>                         -Jeff