I don't think so. I got the idea that it was an on card matching situation and that it was X.509 certificates, not attribute certificates to be used. But I'm not involved in the work.
For biometrics, I see certificate formats as just another package for the data. I certainly don't envision biometrics becoming part of path processing for example. And the biometric data components are often encrypted or otherwise obscured, the details available only to a given vendor. But header information, such as validity information, quality or type, are becoming standardized and benefit from being signed.