Re: [TSP/RFC3161] PKIFailureInfo values

[Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>]

Since, you seem to all agree in principle, can some of you propose a full 
text remplacement, providing the old and new sentence ?

"Only the following values MAY occur" is not crystal clear when bits are 
described.

Denis

PS. Remember that I am still awaiting an interoperability test so that we 
can progress the document on the Standards Track.


> Peter Sylvester wrote:
>
> > > Because with RFC 3161 it's possible that exist two compliant systems
> > > which can't interoperate properly in some situations because one 
> > > accepts that
> > > PKIFailueInfo contains more than one bit with value one (1) and the 
> > > other not!
> > >   
> >
> >
> > It seems that the text could say 'MAY only be any of the following 
> > values'.
> > as the list is a restriction (and extension) of the values define in CMP.
> >
> > Or: 'Only the following values MAY occur'.
> >
> > I could detect an invalid hash algorithm and an unsupported extension,
> > an unacceptable policy, and even time source not available all together.
>
> Peter, I agree with you.
>
> Ricardo Barroso