[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Certificate policy question

To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Certificate policy question
From: Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:31:35 +0100
Cc: dwfilli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Peter Gutmann wrote:


I can't really see the point of having a policy extension (in an EE cert) if
you can have more than one, and they conflict.

I strongly agree with that.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- RE: Certificate policy question
  - From: Peter Gutmann

Prev by Date: Re: Certificate policy question
Next by Date: e-Government uses "Authority-stamp-signatures"
Previous by thread: Re: Certificate policy question
Next by thread: RE: Certificate policy question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread