Archive of ietf-pkix, by date

• Re: Certificate Policies, Anders Rundgren, 03/14/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Margus Freudenthal, 03/14/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (addenda), lynn . wheeler, 03/13/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), lynn . wheeler, 03/13/2003
• LDAP DN: "static table" v. "registry" approach discussions on the LDAPBIS list, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 03/13/2003
• Will IDP syntax and semantics be changed in the future?, Wen-Cheng Wang, 03/13/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Al Arsenault, 03/13/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 03/13/2003
• Antwort: Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Olaf . Schlueter, 03/13/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Margus Freudenthal, 03/13/2003
• Re: QC Declaration, Denis Pinkas, 03/13/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Anders Rundgren, 03/12/2003
• draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-07.txt : IAK(Initial Authentication Key), Jong-Wook, Park, 03/12/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stephen Kent, 03/12/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Stefan Santesson, 03/12/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Sharon Boeyen, 03/12/2003
• RE: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Tim Moses, 03/12/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Steve Hanna, 03/12/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Steve Hanna, 03/12/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Denis Pinkas, 03/12/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Denis Pinkas, 03/12/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Anders Rundgren, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, todd glassey, 03/11/2003
• Draft Agenda for PKIX, wpolk, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, todd glassey, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Sharon Boeyen, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Dean Adams, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/11/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Anders Rundgren, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Sharon Boeyen, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Denis Pinkas, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Sharon Boeyen, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, David Cross, 03/11/2003
• RE: QC Declaration, Sharon Boeyen, 03/11/2003
• Re: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Stephen Kent, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Markus Lorch, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Steve Hanna, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• RE: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Joel S. Kazin, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Olle Mulmo, 03/11/2003
• QC Declaration, Stefan Santesson, 03/11/2003
• RE: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Roger Younglove, 03/11/2003
• Re: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Peter Gutmann, 03/11/2003
• Recommendation on subject matching rules needed.., Vainikainen Saku EINT, 03/11/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (real-world vs. PKIX), Anders Rundgren, 03/11/2003
• RE: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Ryan M. Hurst, 03/10/2003
• Re: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Peter Gutmann, 03/10/2003
• RE: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Santosh Chokhani, 03/10/2003
• Re: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/10/2003
• Re: Certificate Policies (was Re: Trivial PKI Question), Steve Hanna, 03/10/2003
• Re: Agenda Requests for PKIX (seriously), Tim Polk, 03/10/2003
• Agenda Requests for PKIX (seriously), Tim Polk, 03/10/2003
• Non-constructive PKIX Input, Anders Rundgren, 03/10/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stephen Kent, 03/10/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/10/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, todd glassey, 03/10/2003
• Re: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Tim Polk, 03/10/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 03/10/2003
• RE: General purpose OId's for certificate policies?, Roger Younglove, 03/10/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stefan Santesson, 03/10/2003
• Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/10/2003
• RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Stefan Santesson, 03/10/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/09/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Jimi Thompson, 03/09/2003
• Re: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Tom Gindin, 03/09/2003
• General purpose OId's for certificate policies?, nojunkhere, 03/09/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/08/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Jimi Thompson, 03/08/2003
• Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Peter Gutmann, 03/08/2003
• The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda, Anders Rundgren, 03/08/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Peter Sylvester, 03/07/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Stephen Kent, 03/07/2003
• [Fwd: RFC3281 erratum], Stephen Farrell, 03/07/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-logotypes-10.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/07/2003
• Buyer cert, Henrik Bergman, 03/07/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Anders Rundgren, 03/06/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about whole thing..., todd glassey, 03/06/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Jimi Thompson, 03/06/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about whole thing..., Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/06/2003
• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Jim Schaad, 03/06/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Stephen Kent, 03/06/2003
• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Russ Housley, 03/06/2003
• Re: basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, Peter Gutmann, 03/06/2003
• basicConstraints with CA=False in EE certs, chris . gilbert, 03/06/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-sonof3039-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/06/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Anders Rundgren, 03/06/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about whole thing..., todd glassey, 03/05/2003
• RE: Trivial PKI Question, Roger Younglove, 03/05/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, Anders Rundgren, 03/05/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-proxy-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/05/2003
• Proxy Cert draft (04) submitted - request for last call, Von Welch, 03/05/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/04/2003
• RE: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Roger Younglove, 03/04/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, todd glassey, 03/04/2003
• Re: Trivial PKI Question, chris . gilbert, 03/04/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Peter Gutmann, 03/03/2003
• RE: Trivial PKI Question, Olle Mulmo, 03/03/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 03/03/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Manger, James H, 03/03/2003
• Trivial PKI Question, Anders Rundgren, 03/03/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Peter Gutmann, 03/03/2003
• Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Peter Sylvester, 03/03/2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-acpolicies-extn-02.txt, Russ Housley, 03/03/2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-acpolicies-extn-02.txt, Russ Housley, 03/03/2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-acpolicies-extn-02.txt, Denis Pinkas, 03/03/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-acpolicies-extn-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/03/2003
• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Jim Schaad, 03/02/2003
• Re: RFC 3161 Interoperability Site, Pere Fiol, 02/28/2003
• Son of RFC 3039 draft available, Stefan Santesson, 02/28/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], k-fujino, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], k-fujino, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/27/2003
• Re: RFC 3161 Interoperability Site, Ricardo Barroso, 02/27/2003
• RE: RFC 3161 Interoperability Site, Miguel Rodriguez, 02/27/2003
• Re: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], David A. Cooper, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Sharon Boeyen, 02/27/2003
• Re: RFC 3161 Interoperability Site, Denis Pinkas, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/27/2003
• RFC 3161 Interoperability Site, Robert Zuccherato, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Sharon Boeyen, 02/27/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/26/2003
• RE: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Sharon Boeyen, 02/26/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Kaliski, Burt, 02/26/2003
• v2.2 Certificate Management Library (CML) Now Available, Pawling, John, 02/24/2003
• v1.5 Enhanced SNACC Freeware Now Available, Pawling, John, 02/24/2003
• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Russ Housley, 02/24/2003
• FW: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], InKyoung Jeun, 02/23/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Tom Gindin, 02/22/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Russ Housley, 02/21/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Russ Housley, 02/21/2003
• RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Kaliski, Burt, 02/21/2003
• Re: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Santosh Chokhani, 02/21/2003
• Re: SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], Russ Housley, 02/20/2003
• DPD/DPV Protocol Selection, Tim Polk, 02/20/2003
• Re: SMIME and disclaimers, Tom Gindin, 02/20/2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-ac-schema-00.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/20/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-tap-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/20/2003
• Re: SMIME and disclaimers, Peter Gutmann, 02/19/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-ac-schema-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/19/2003
• RE: SMIME and disclaimers, Khaja Ahmed, 02/18/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Manger, James H, 02/18/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Jim Schaad, 02/18/2003
• Re: signatureAlgorithm in PKCS#7/RFC 2630/RFC 3369/70, Tom Gindin, 02/18/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 02/18/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Aram Perez, 02/17/2003
• signatureAlgorithm in PKCS#7/RFC 2630/RFC 3369/70, Holger Ebel, 02/17/2003
• SMIME and disclaimers, chris . gilbert, 02/17/2003
• SkipCerts Question [RFC3280], k-fujino, 02/17/2003
• Re: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/16/2003
• Getting the encryption key. Was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 02/16/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Eric Norman, 02/15/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/15/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Eric Norman, 02/15/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/14/2003
• surrogate/agent addenda (long), lynn . wheeler, 02/14/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Aram Perez, 02/14/2003
• RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-07.txt, Carlisle Adams, 02/14/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/14/2003
• RE: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/14/2003
• Re: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/14/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Aram Perez, 02/14/2003
• RE: A challenge, Tom Jones \(.NET\), 02/14/2003
• Re: Issues with draft-ietf-pkix-pr-tsa-02.txt, Denis Pinkas, 02/14/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/14/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gietz, 02/14/2003
• Re: A challenge, Stephen Kent, 02/13/2003
• Re: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/13/2003
• RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol, Pere Fiol, 02/13/2003
• RE: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/13/2003
• Re: A challenge, Al Arsenault, 02/13/2003
• Re: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/12/2003
• RE: A challenge, Olle Mulmo, 02/12/2003
• Re: A challenge, Torsten Hentschel, 02/12/2003
• RE: RSA: 00: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt - binding key to 1 alg, Manger, James H, 02/11/2003
• RE: A challenge, Simon Tardell, 02/11/2003
• RE: A challenge (addenda), lynn . wheeler, 02/11/2003
• Re: A challenge, Anders Rundgren, 02/11/2003
• Antwort: Re: A challenge, Olaf . Schlueter, 02/11/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-crl-schema-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/11/2003
• RE: A challenge, lynn . wheeler, 02/10/2003
• Last Call: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF) to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 02/10/2003
• Last Call: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocols to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 02/10/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/10/2003
• RE: A challenge, Simon Tardell, 02/10/2003
• Re: A challenge, Juergen Brauckmann, 02/10/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Peter Gutmann, 02/09/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 02/09/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 02/09/2003
• RE: A challenge, Hans Nilsson, 02/09/2003
• Re: A challenge, Stefan Santesson, 02/08/2003
• AD Review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-05.txt, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 02/07/2003
• AD Review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-07.txt, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 02/07/2003
• Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-00.txt, Jim Schaad, 02/07/2003
• Re: A challenge, Anders Rundgren, 02/07/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, luciano . medina, 02/07/2003
• A challenge, Olaf . Schlueter, 02/07/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), lynn . wheeler, 02/07/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/07/2003
• Path validation decision based on notAfter, luciano . medina, 02/07/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Torsten Hentschel, 02/07/2003
• Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Olaf . Schlueter, 02/07/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 02/07/2003
• RE: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Trevor Freeman, 02/06/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 02/06/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 02/06/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Stephen Kent, 02/06/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, David Chadwick, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Steve Hanna, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Joel S. Kazin, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Steve Hanna, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Denis Pinkas, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Steve Hanna, 02/06/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-certstore-http-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Torsten Hentschel, 02/06/2003
• Re: Path validation decision based on notAfter, Denis Pinkas, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Torsten Hentschel, 02/06/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 02/06/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 02/06/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), lynn . wheeler, 02/05/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 02/05/2003
• Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Olaf . Schlueter, 02/05/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Juergen Brauckmann, 02/05/2003
• Re: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Stephen Kent, 02/04/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Stephen Kent, 02/04/2003
• RE: Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 02/04/2003
• Antwort: Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Olaf . Schlueter, 02/03/2003
• Update: Progress report: RFC 3280/3281 Interop testing, Christopher Brown, 02/03/2003
• Re: Request for Consideration of RFC, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 02/02/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/31/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/31/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 01/31/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: Request for Consideration of RFC, Steven M. Bellovin, 01/30/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Request for Consideration of RFC 2511bis by IESG, Tim Polk, 01/30/2003
• Request for Consideration of RFC 2510bis by IESG, Tim Polk, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Anders Rundgren, 01/30/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Simon Tardell, 01/30/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Marc Poulaud, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 01/30/2003
• Re: Encrypted mail in Limbo, Anders Rundgren, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 01/30/2003
• Re: Encrypted mail in Limbo, Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Encrypted mail in Limbo, Anders Rundgren, 01/30/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/30/2003
• Re: More comments on the kitchenSink extension, Anders Rundgren, 01/30/2003
• Re: More comments on the kitchenSink extension, Peter Gutmann, 01/29/2003
• Re: More comments on the kitchenSink extension, Anders Rundgren, 01/29/2003
• More comments on the kitchenSink extension, Peter Gutmann, 01/29/2003
• Re: Authenticated CERTSTORE URLs, Peter Gutmann, 01/29/2003
• RE: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Peter Gutmann, 01/29/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Marc Poulaud, 01/29/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 01/29/2003
• RE: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/29/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Anders Rundgren, 01/29/2003
• STRAWPOLL: ABSTAIN (with explanation), Carlisle Adams, 01/29/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Denis Pinkas, 01/29/2003
• Re: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Anders Rundgren, 01/29/2003
• RE: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Peter Gutmann, 01/28/2003
• RE: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/28/2003
• Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Stephen Kent, 01/28/2003
• RE: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/28/2003
• STRAWPOLL: XKMS, Anders Rundgren, 01/28/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Kefeng Chen, 01/28/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Vohnoutová Marta, 01/28/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Michael Ströder, 01/28/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Anders Rundgren, 01/28/2003
• Authenticated CERTSTORE URLs, Anders Rundgren, 01/28/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Anders Rundgren, 01/28/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Peter Gutmann, 01/28/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 01/28/2003
• STRAWPOLL: SCVP, faisal.maqsood, 01/27/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Anders Rundgren, 01/27/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Tom Biskupic, 01/27/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Jong-Wook, Park, 01/27/2003
• Re: CERTSTORE's 160 bit limit + PI, Peter Gutmann, 01/27/2003
• Re: Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Peter Gutmann, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/27/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Blake Ramsdell, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 01/27/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/27/2003
• Re: Rating of the DVCS Compliance Matrix, Peter Sylvester, 01/27/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/27/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/27/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/27/2003
• STRAWPOLL: OCSP, Florian Oelmaier, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/27/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Wahaj, 01/27/2003
• STRAWPOLL: ABSTAIN, Denis Pinkas, 01/27/2003
• Rating of the SCVP Compliance Matrix, Denis Pinkas, 01/27/2003
• Rating of the DVCS Compliance Matrix, Denis Pinkas, 01/27/2003
• Rating of the "DPV and DPD over OCSP" Compliance Matrix, Denis Pinkas, 01/27/2003
• Lookup from DNS was: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful, Anders Rundgren, 01/27/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Blake Ramsdell, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, lynn . wheeler, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 01/26/2003
• Re: CERTSTORE's 160 bit limit, Peter Gutmann, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Dean Povey, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Dean Povey, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Tom Gindin, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Blake Ramsdell, 01/26/2003
• CERTSTORE's 160 bit limit, Anders Rundgren, 01/26/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/26/2003
• RE: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Blake Ramsdell, 01/25/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Michael Ströder, 01/25/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Anders Rundgren, 01/25/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Massimiliano Pala, 01/25/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Khaja Ahmed, 01/24/2003
• Re: X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Peter Gutmann, 01/24/2003
• X.500, LDAP Considered harmful Was: OCSP/LDAP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/24/2003
• Re: Progress report: RFC 3280/3281 Interop testing, Christopher Brown, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Andreas Laumann, 01/24/2003
• Re: IESG Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-01.txt, Steven M. Bellovin, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Alice Sturgeon, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Eamonn Maher, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Ford, Warwick, 01/24/2003
• Strawpoll: OCSP, Covey Carlin-p56287, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL: SCVP, Peter Hesse, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Denis Issoupov, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:CVP, Brian Hunter, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Ing. Raffaello Galli, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Pinkava Jaroslav, 01/24/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, aLUNZ Scott, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, James Jing, 01/23/2003
• Strawpoll: OCSP, Stephen Wu, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Deacon, Alex, 01/23/2003
• Voting rationale (was RE: STRAWPOLL:ABSTAIN), Eric D. Williams, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Walker, Jesse, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Hicks, Mack, 01/23/2003
• RE: STRAWPOLL:ABSTAIN, Yee, Peter, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Rodney Thayer, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:ABSTAIN, David P. Kemp, 01/23/2003
• Strawpoll:SCVP, Gary Visser, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Fillingham, David W., 01/23/2003
• RE: IESG Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-01.txt, Alice Sturgeon, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Michael Myers, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL: SCVP, Sarbari Gupta, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Ryan M. Hurst, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/23/2003
• Re: Issues with draft-ietf-pkix-pr-tsa-02.txt, Steven M. Bellovin, 01/23/2003
• Issues with draft-ietf-pkix-pr-tsa-02.txt, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 01/23/2003
• IESG Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-01.txt, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 01/23/2003
• Re: What to do with incorrectly encoded X509 extensions ?, Julien Stern, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Stephen Farrell, 01/23/2003
• Re: What to do with incorrectly encoded X509 extensions ?, Russ Housley, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:OCSP, Phillip H. Griffin, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL: SCVP, ALFRED ARSENAULT, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVP/DPD, Phillip H. Griffin, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Giovanni Frustaci, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, Alfonso De Gregorio, 01/23/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Denis Pinkas, 01/23/2003
• STRAWPOLL:DVCS, tho, 01/23/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/23/2003
• RE: STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Peter Gutmann, 01/22/2003
• RE: STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Michael Myers, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL: SCVP, Frank Balluffi, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Blake Ramsdell, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Jacoby, Jeffrey, 01/22/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Peter Sylvester, 01/22/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Tim Polk, 01/22/2003
• strawpoll:DVCS, Peter Sylvester, 01/22/2003
• Progress report: RFC 3280/3281 Interop testing, Tim Polk, 01/22/2003
• strawpoll:SCVP, Trevor Freeman, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Yuriy Dzambasow, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Yee, Peter, 01/22/2003
• DVCS Compliance Matrix, Peter Sylvester, 01/22/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Peter Sylvester, 01/22/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Ambarish Malpani, 01/22/2003
• Re: STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Eric D. Williams, 01/22/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Peter Sylvester, 01/22/2003
• What to do with incorrectly encoded X509 extensions ?, Julien Stern, 01/22/2003
• Re: Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, Denis Pinkas, 01/22/2003
• RFC 3379 compliance matrix for CVP, Denis Pinkas, 01/22/2003
• Re: STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Les Mitchell, 01/21/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Santosh Chokhani, 01/21/2003
• STRAWPOLL:SCVP, Russ Housley, 01/21/2003
• Strawpoll for DPD/DPV protocols, wpolk, 01/21/2003
• RE: RFC 2527 Revision, Santosh Chokhani, 01/21/2003
• Re: RFC 2527 Revision, Stefan Kelm, 01/21/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-cvp-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/21/2003
• RE: "Basic" path-validation question, Stephen Kent, 01/20/2003
• RE: Best rollover practise, Trevor Freeman, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/20/2003
• Re: Best rollover practise, Joel S. Kazin, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/20/2003
• RE: "Basic" path-validation question, Roger Younglove, 01/20/2003
• Re: (Un)managing non-existent DNs in enrolments, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 01/20/2003
• Re: (Un)managing non-existent DNs in enrolments, Peter Gutmann, 01/20/2003
• (Un)managing non-existent DNs in enrolments, chris . gilbert, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/20/2003
• Re: about CRLdp, Eve Chow - Yahoo, 01/20/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Denis Pinkas, 01/20/2003
• Re: Another certificate policy question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/19/2003
• Re: Another certificate policy question, Peter Gutmann, 01/19/2003
• RE: "Basic" path-validation question, James Jing, 01/19/2003
• Re: Another certificate policy question, Peter Gutmann, 01/19/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 01/19/2003
• Best rollover practise, Haaino Beljaars, 01/19/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Camile Howe, 01/18/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/18/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/17/2003
• Re: Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Tammy Green, 01/17/2003
• RE: Another certificate policy question, Santosh Chokhani, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/17/2003
• Re: Another certificate policy question, Joel S. Kazin, 01/17/2003
• RE: about CRLdp, Roger Younglove, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Jean-Marc Desperrier, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/17/2003
• Re: "Basic" path-validation question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/17/2003
• Re: Another certificate policy question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/17/2003
• Re: Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Vadim Fedukovich, 01/17/2003
• about CRLdp, Eve Chow - Yahoo, 01/17/2003
• "Basic" path-validation question, Anders Rundgren, 01/17/2003
• Comment on RFC 3161/3161bis, Peter Gutmann, 01/16/2003
• Another certificate policy question, Peter Gutmann, 01/16/2003
• New draft: Real-time Certificate Status Facility for OCSP - (RTCS), Peter Gutmann, 01/16/2003
• Re: Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Tammy Green, 01/16/2003
• RE: CA Liability:Warranty/ draft-ietf-pkix-warranty-extn-01.txt, Roger Younglove, 01/16/2003
• RE: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), chris . gilbert, 01/16/2003
• CA Liability:Warranty/ draft-ietf-pkix-warranty-extn-01.txt, Anders Rundgren, 01/15/2003
• Re: SCVP validation policy, Russ Housley, 01/15/2003
• Re: Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Vadim Fedukovich, 01/15/2003
• RE: RFC3039/X.500 naming question, Stefan Santesson, 01/15/2003
• FW: Automatic certificate selection for signing, Liaquat Khan, 01/15/2003
• SCVP validation policy, Liaquat Khan, 01/15/2003
• Re: Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Anders Rundgren, 01/14/2003
• OCSP for DPV and DPD rqmts compliance, Michael Myers, 01/14/2003
• Q. Automatic certificate selection for signing, Marc Poulaud, 01/14/2003
• Re: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), Russ Housley, 01/14/2003
• RE: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), Sharon Boeyen, 01/14/2003
• Re: RFC3039/X.500 naming question, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/14/2003
• Re: RFC3039/X.500 naming question, Anders Rundgren, 01/14/2003
• RE: RFC3039/X.500 naming question, Stefan Santesson, 01/14/2003
• RFC3039/X.500 naming question, Anders Rundgren, 01/13/2003
• RE: WG Last Call: Logotypes, Trevor Freeman, 01/13/2003
• SubjectAltName comparison question., Julien Stern, 01/13/2003
• Re: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), Timothy Hahn, 01/13/2003
• Re: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), chris . gilbert, 01/13/2003
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-pi-06.txt, Anders Rundgren, 01/12/2003
• Re: LDAP PKI Schema (was Re: No-op LDAP ;binary option), Russ Housley, 01/10/2003
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-dpvdpd-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 01/10/2003
• Re: WG Last Call: Logotypes, Russ Housley, 01/10/2003
• Re: WG Last Call: Logotypes, Denis Pinkas, 01/10/2003
• Re: WG Last Call: Logotypes, Russ Housley, 01/10/2003
• Re: [TSP] while introduce TSU in RFC3161bis-00?, Denis Pinkas, 01/10/2003
• Re: WG Last Call: Logotypes, Denis Pinkas, 01/10/2003
• Re: e-tendering enabler digital certificate, chris . gilbert, 01/10/2003
• Re: e-tendering enabler digital certificate, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 01/10/2003
• Re: e-tendering enabler digital certificate, chris . gilbert, 01/10/2003
• RE: OCSP signed requests, Ambarish Malpani, 01/09/2003
• RE: OCSP signed requests, Michael Myers, 01/09/2003
• OCSP signed requests, Miguel Rodriguez, 01/09/2003
• e-tendering enabler digital certificate, malek . bechlaghem, 01/09/2003

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the VPN Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to paul.hoffman@vpnc.org.