[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OCSP and LDAP

To: "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OCSP and LDAP
From: lynn.wheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:15:37 -0700
Cc: "Ambarish Malpani" <ambarish@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "IETF PKIX" <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx


... aka ... i never said you can't have a certificate with r/o stale,
static subset copy of the real information ....
i just said that in an online environment whre you have the real-time,
fresh, dynamic, &/or aggregate of the
real information ... then the r/o stale, static, subset copy is redundant
and superfluous.

for a particular business/value operation, if the r/o stale, static, subset
copy is redundant and superfluous ... then it seems to follow that an OCSP
transaction giving an opinion about the staleness of tedundant and
superfluous information is also superfluous.

--
Internet trivia, 20th anv: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm

Prev by Date: Re: OCSP and LDAP
Next by Date: HTML version of Challenge PKI 2001 is ready.
Previous by thread: Re: OCSP and LDAP
Next by thread: Re: OCSP and LDAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread