[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: QC Declaration

To: "'pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx, Sharon Boeyen <sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: QC Declaration
From: Sharon Boeyen <sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:52:16 -0500
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Actually its a of both isn't it :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 12:45 PM
To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx; sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx; stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: QC Declaration


Sharon Boeyen <sharon.boeyen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Remember first that RFC 3280 is a "profile" of X.509 and it does not
replace
>the requirements of 509, but rather profiles them to a subset.
                                                        ^^^^^^
You misspelled "superset".

Peter.

Prev by Date: RE: QC Declaration
Next by Date: RE: Recommendation on subject matching rules needed..
Previous by thread: RE: QC Declaration
Next by thread: RE: QC Declaration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread