[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 3039 problems - Was: Re: The IETF 56 - PKIX Agenda


At 17:57 2003-03-11 +0100, Denis Pinkas wrote:
>I do kown that in fact 676767666767 would allow to uniquely identify the individual, but this is not the semantics of that attribute.

Denis,

Where is the semantics broken?

Who says that a serial number need to start with 1 and be sequential with increment = 1

You have only to look at most software products, TV sets or similar to see another truth.
676767666767 is a perfectly fine serial number to me.

/Stefan




_____________________________
Stefan Santesson, Retrospekt AB
http://www.retrospekt.com
+46-706 443351