[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol

To: "'todd glassey'" <todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ricardo Barroso <ricardo.barroso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gianluca Ramunno <ramunno@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol
From: Carlisle Adams <carlisle.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:51:33 -0400
Cc: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx, housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "Lynn St.Amour" <st.amour@xxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Wow!  I'm sure that the authors of 3161 must feel a tremendous
responsibility for having unknowingly precipitated this impending
catastrophe...

-----Original Message-----
From: todd glassey [mailto:todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Ricardo Barroso; Gianluca Ramunno
Cc: Stephen Kent; ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx; housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Lynn St.Amour
Subject: Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol

I see the ascension of 3161 as one of the saddest things that can happen
since it will permanently impugn PKIX and in fact may be the key item
necessary to force the deconstruction of the IETF as we know it today.

Prev by Date: Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol
Next by Date: Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol
Previous by thread: RE: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol
Next by thread: RE: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread