Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol

["todd glassey" <todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve - the things I have to reply to this I will cc to Tim but there is
little point in continuing this conversation. Lets just leave it that I
forced the issue into the spotlight again so it will appear in the mailing
list archive unless its edited out,  and you folks (you and Tim as the WG
Chairs) can ride the wave whatever happens.

Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Kent" <kent@xxxxxxx>
To: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: RFC3161(TSP): doubts about tcp protocol


> Todd,
>
> I don't need to play by your rules (e.g., meeting your criteria for
> invalidating what you assert) to convey my message in this forum.
>
> My comments are rational and clear, unlike most of yours.
>
> You seem to confuse cause and effect. It is not that people pay
> attention to what I say primarily because I am the PKIX WG chair.
> Rather, in part, I was selected to serve as chair because of my
> knowledge in the area. Thus people often pay attention to what I say
> because what I say generally makes sense, and is usually correct,
> irrespective of my role in this WG.
>
> Steve