[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs

To: PKIX <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
From: Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:21:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030626

Antonio Lioy wrote:

Wen-Cheng Wang wrote:

My concern is a CA may support dual key pairs for a single EE.

>

So support for multiple certs per each user should be added to the schema.

I'd suggest to read the draft. Hint: Multi-valued attributes are not the only way to store multiple certificates per user.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- Issues in LDAP schema IDs
  - From: David Chadwick
- Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
  - From: Michael Ströder
- Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
  - From: Wen-Cheng Wang
- Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
  - From: Antonio Lioy

Prev by Date: Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
Next by Date: Re: WG Last Call: SCVP
Previous by thread: Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
Next by thread: Re: Issues in LDAP schema IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread