Re: draft minutes

[Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> 
> PKIX WG Specifications
> 
> 	Simple Certificate Validation Protocol - Trevor Freeman (Microsoft)
> The current draft of SCVP is in WG Last Call, and is believed to be in
> full compliance with RFC 3379. This presentation discussed changes 
> since the previous (version 11) draft. Plan is to progress to WG last 
> call very soon. [slides]
> 
> 

- Does the last sentence mean IETF last call? 

- After having received at least one complaint (from me),
  Tim Polk announced in the meeting that a new two weeks
  last call period would start after the IETF meeting, the
  reason being that both for participants of the meeting and
  non participants either the travel time or potential discussions
  create some time problems.

- Since non participants of the meeting did not hear this, 
  it seems somewhat logical to me to inform the list BEFORE a new 
  period starts, so everybody know can know this. I expected
  a mail to the list immediately after the meeting, but maybe
  the chairmen did as me, and left Wien immediately so
  they did not have the chance to send a mail. 

- Not even finding this announcement in the draft minutes is
  more surprising. 

- But: Even if the draft minutes would have reflected it, already
  one week would hae ben gone. 

- Therefore I kindly request the chairmen to announce in a
  mail to the list a new beginning of a last call starting
  not less than one full working day in all areas of this
  planet, and the period not covering an IETF meeting. 

Thanks for consideration. 
Peter