[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1

Russ wrote:

[...]

> Rather than defining a new extension, called nonceUnsupported, you have
> the opportunity to specify a syntax to go with this OID that does the
> same thing.  Something like:
>
>     OCSPNonce ::= CHOICE {
>        nonceValue  OCTET STRING,
>        unsupported  NULL }

Unfortunately, this would break compatibility with clients supporting RFC
3546 (see Section 3.6 in that document).

-- Magnus