[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1

To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1
From: "Florian Oelmaier" <oelmaier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5 Dec 2003 10:30:22 -0000
Cc: "'David Engberg'" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <liaquat.khan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Ryan M. Hurst'" <rmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> I am concerned with the idea of making any change to the standard that
> "changes the 5 year old protocol".

I wholeheartly welcome the clarification and the change Russ proposed - but I am also concerned with interoperability issues.

Maybe we can keep the "old" nonce as it is and specify a new extension id for the new nonce? Then we can clarify that the "old" nonce is deprecated and that clients and servers should use the "new" nonce behaviour.

This way we can clarify the situation and simultaneous maintain compatibility.  

-- 
Florian Oelmaier
SyTrust

Prev by Date: Re: DN Encoding by UTF8String
Next by Date: Re: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1
Previous by thread: RE: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1
Next by thread: RE: DISCUSS: MUST reject in OCSPv1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread