[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OCSP in TLS handshake

To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OCSP in TLS handshake
From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:58:32 -0800
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031110

Marc Branchaud wrote:

I'm not trying to be obtuse here (it actually takes very little effort), but I really need a patient explanation of why nonceUnsupported precludes the use of OCSP responses in the TLS handshake.

OK, I'd settle for an impatient explanation...

M.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

References:
- OCSP in TLS handshake
  - From: Marc Branchaud

Prev by Date: RE: Cached OCSP responses vs. single entry CRLs
Next by Date: Re[2]: DN Encoding by UTF8String
Previous by thread: OCSP in TLS handshake
Next by thread: RE: OCSP in TLS handshake
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread