[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates

To: Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:55:54 -0500
Cc: Stefan Santesson <stefans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pkix <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <0C3042E92D8A714783E2C44AB9936E1D9EF5E9@EUR-MSG-03.europe.corp.microsoft.c om> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Denis,

I think the WG has endorsed revisions to 3039, not creation of a new RFC. So, we can debate issues within the new document, but let's not not debate whether the new document replaces 3039.

Steve

References:
- Re: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
  - From: Denis Pinkas

Prev by Date: Re: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
Next by Date: RE: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
Previous by thread: Re: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
Next by thread: RE: Summary RE: Last Call: Qualified Certificates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread