RE: New Lightweight OCSP I-D

["Michael Myers" <mmyers@xxxxxxxxx>]

Alex, Santosh:

A few thoughts embedded below.

Mike


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Deacon, Alex
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004
>
> . . .
>
> Moving some of the MUSTs to SHOULDs seems to water down
> what we are trying to accomplish.   

I concur.

> > 1.  Section 1.2.2, sha256WithRSAEncryption should be
> > added to the signature algorithms.

> Although I understand the reasoning behind adding this
> requirement, I think doing so is a little premature and
> would create a situation. Where this draft is no longer
> a strict profile of RFC2560.   I think 2560 has to move
> first on this point.  

My action, subject to chair guidance.

Mike