[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs

To: "'pkix'" <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
From: "Santosh Chokhani" <chokhani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:34:26 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Denis,

Just show us how SIA (wherever you want to put it) is more efficient than
AIA for CRL signer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Denis Pinkas [mailto:Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:04 AM
To: Santosh Chokhani
Cc: 'pkix'
Subject: Re: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs

Santosh,

You wrote:

> And, SIA for end certificate will add computational complexity.

SIA, for this discussion, is not for end certificates, but for CA
certificates.

Denis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
  - From: Denis Pinkas

References:
- Re: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
  - From: Denis Pinkas

Prev by Date: RE: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
Next by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-ac-schema-02.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
Next by thread: Re: Signer certificate discovery for CRLs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread