[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: registration authorities

To: <gonzalezcarlos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: registration authorities
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:53:52 -0500
Cc: <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <001401c4e35c$62e5f2f0$391112ac@extendforce.net>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <001401c4e35c$62e5f2f0$391112ac@extendforce.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Title: Re: registration authorities

At 11:45 AM +0100 12/16/04, Carlos González-Cadenas wrote:

Hi all,

In RFC 3739 (Qualified Certificates Profile), we do have a place to state the name of the registration authorities that registered the names and attributes present in the certificate.

Is there any standard way to do it in non-qualified certificates?

Thanks in advance

Carlos

No, just the CA name.

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: registration authorities
  - From: David Chadwick

References:
- registration authorities
  - From: Carlos González-Cadenas

Prev by Date: registration authorities
Next by Date: Re: Proposed Changes to RFC 3280
Previous by thread: registration authorities
Next by thread: Re: registration authorities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread