[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?

To: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <levitte@xxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:36:50 +0100 (CET)
Cc: anders.rundgren@xxxxxxxxx, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxxxx

In message <41C440A2.5000806@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:37:22 +0100, Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

michael> 
michael> Anders Rundgren wrote:
[...]
michael> > Comments?
michael> 
michael> What exactly is your question?

I'm going to boldly assume his question means "Do you have any
comments on this practice, and what are they?".  What motives Anders
has, except taking the risk of getting his head bitten off (:-)),
that's an entirely different question.

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte     | http://richard.levitte.org/ | Tunnlandsv. 52
Levitte Programming | http://www.lp.se/           | S-168 36 Bromma
T: +46-708-26 53 44 |                             | SWEDEN
     "Price, performance, quality...  choose the two you like"

References:
- SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?
  - From: Anders Rundgren
- Re: SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?
  - From: Michael Ströder

Prev by Date: Re: SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?
Next by Date: RFC 3280 and multiple Organization (O) fields in DN
Previous by thread: Re: SSL/TLS client-auth - Not the way forward?
Next by thread: RFC 3280 and multiple Organization (O) fields in DN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread