Re: X.509 certificate and its subject name field

["Shyh-Wei Luan" <luan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 6,  8:57am, Shyh-Wei Luan wrote:
> Subject: Re: X.509 certificate and its subject name field
> > What is the basis for this name re-use speculation ?
>
> > Clearly there will be no shortage of CA name space.  What may
> > be a problem is a shortage of _desirable_ CA names.  Witness
> > the shortage of desirable names in the DNS.
>
> This is exactly what I mean.  Yeah, "desirable CA names" is a better
> way to put it - just like desirable DN's.
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I guess I meant to say *desirable DNS names* and desirable *DN's* (for those
which do not have some UID attribute) at the same time.  Sigh, I guess I am
little bit tired.  :-)

Shyh-Wei