[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Padding in the context of signature algorithms
- To: Wolfgang Schneider <schneiw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Non Receipt Notification Requested), ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxx (Non Receipt Notification Requested)
- Subject: RE: Padding in the context of signature algorithms
- From: <Bengt.Ackzell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 18:22:58 +0200
- In-reply-to: <>
- Original-encoded-information-types: teletex
- X400-content-type: P2-1984 (2)
- X400-mts-identifier: [/ADMD=400NET/C=SE/;MHSP25MHBB R0014000871662177176]
- X400-originator: Bengt.Ackzell@AIT.400net.tip.net
- X400-received: by mta switchgate.switch.ch in /ADMD=SWITCHgate/C=ch/; Relayed; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 18:23:25 +0200
- X400-received: by mta UNIWORLD-SAT05 in /ADMD=SWITCHHOP/C=CH/; Relayed; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 18:24:36 +0200
- X400-received: by /ADMD=400NET/C=NL/; Relayed; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 18:23:03 +0200
- X400-received: by /ADMD=400NET/C=SE/; Relayed; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 18:22:58 +0200
- X400-recipients: non-disclosure:;
Yes, the padding has to be defined.
Do anyone have a well deployed padding for SHA-1?
/Bengt Ackzell