[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]

To: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
From: Ben Laurie <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 20:08:47 +0100
Cc: George Capehart <gwc@xxxxxxxx>, "'ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxx'" <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: A.L. Digital Ltd.
References: <> <> <> <>

Peter Williams wrote:
> A site's firewall can scan the activeX control's java
> opcodes and ensure they meet "security requirements"
> beyond mere well-formedness, before the control enters
> the enclosure for execution. And this is not theory...

Sounds more like marketing hype than theory to me. Who claims to be able
to do this?

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435|Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Peter Williams

References:
- RE: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Carlisle Adams
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Peter Williams
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: George Capehart
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Peter Williams

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
Next by Date: Re: PKIX1 definition of a certificate
Previous by thread: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
Next by thread: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread