[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]

To: Dwight Arthur <dwightarthur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 06:37:07 -0400
Cc: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx, George Capehart <gwc@xxxxxxxx>, PKIX List <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
References: <><> <><>

Dwight,

	Your concern cited in the example is valid, but it also is outside
of th scope of PKIX.

Steve

References:
- RE: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Carlisle Adams
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Peter Williams
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: George Capehart
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Peter Williams
- Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
  - From: Dwight Arthur

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call (CMP proof-of-possession)
Next by Date: Re: Last Call (CMP proof-of-possession)
Previous by thread: Re: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
Next by thread: RE: Comments on [MANDATORY cert discovery capabiity]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread