[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP v CRLs over HTTP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 9 Dec 1997 mmyers@verisign.com wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> My interpretation of your requirement implies the CA operate in a fashion
> that enables the "false revocation" attack Carlisle earlier identified. I
> may be misunderstanding your requiremment however. May I ask that you
> express it more precisely?
>
> Mike
>
I don't remember the specifics about Carlisle's attack, and the archive on
ftp.tandem.com seems to end in September. Could you give me a brief
refresher?
Marc
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Marc Branchaud \/
Chief PKI Architect /\CERT SOFTWARE INC.
marcnarc@xcert.com PKI References page: www.xcert.com
604-640-6227 www.xcert.com/~marcnarc/PKI/
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
PGP key fingerprint: 60 11 4B 9D 4E E5 2F 47 BD C5 C2 BF 26 DF 5A E1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQB1AwUBNJAiXlrdFXNdDxPlAQFzOwMAki62fVGf1Apcjy7qrz7JJrEAj01y14CF
kaQouGcG8BEMOnv11z4DYFhSnfcebSMlxWNetcWqkn4N6cSnrGMShHCErjftQA23
7gKQXtB7JfVQbaI5cazrUpwwFcPPR9xp
=zNIR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----