Re: Critical extensions and Policy OIDs

["Charles Moore" <cmoore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Simonetti David <simonetti_david@bah.com>
To: moshe@checkpoint.com <moshe@checkpoint.com>
Cc: ietf-pkix@Tandem.COM <ietf-pkix@Tandem.COM>
Date: Friday, 12 December 1997 2:54
Subject: Re: Critical extensions and Policy OIDs


:Moshe,
:
:I respectively disagree with your analysis.  The paranthetical of PKIX-1
:is not a reference to cert path validation, but rather is a reference to
:how the application *uses* the certificate after validation (please
:let's not debate the merits applying requirements to the application).


But that is the issue, and PKIX should not try and standardise applications.

Stick to providing standardised services that let end users make policy
decisions.





Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature;
	name="smime.p7s"
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="smime.p7s"

Attachment converted: Lutefisk:smime.p7s (????/----) (0001DBD2)