[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IETF-PKIX] Critical extensions and Policy OIDs

To: IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Critical extensions and Policy OIDs
From: Mike Smith <mfsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 09:07:58 -0700
Comments: To: BJUENEMAN@NOVELL.COM
Comments: cc: S670MDL@zionsbank.com, S814FSB@zionsbank.com, S814JZF@zionsbank.com
Reply-to: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bob:

Isn't the policy OID referring to the CA's disclosure of practices under which they will operate AND under which they assume responsibility for the subscriber's use of issued certs?  Don't some act as disclosure forms as in bank lending, wherein they govern actions of the subscribers?

Michael

>>> Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@NOVELL.COM> 12/11/97 04:38PM >>>
******************  InterScan Message (on zbc2)

noname is scanned and no virus found

*********************************************************

Prev by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and Cross-certification
Next by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and Cross-certification
Previous by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Critical extensions and Policy OIDs
Next by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Critical extensions and Policy OIDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread