[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status

To: IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
From: Rich Ankney <rankney@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:18:08 -0500
Approved-by: Rich Ankney <rankney@EROLS.COM>
Reply-to: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

So what's the status of the notary protocol?  I'm inclined to use
that, rather than OCSP, for any important (high-value) apps.

Regards,
Rich

----------
> From: Robert Zuccherato <robert.zuccherato@ENTRUST.COM>
> To: IETF-PKIX@LISTS.TANDEM.COM
> Subject: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 9:09 AM
>
> I submitted this message to the list yesterday, but I haven't seen it
> show up yet.  My apologies to anyone who receives it twice.
>
[snip]

Prev by Date: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
Next by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
Previous by thread: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
Next by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] FW: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread