Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Current Status

[Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I also think OCSP should be defined in a transport independent fashion.  I
do not think it will be hard to remove the http dependencies.

Russ

At 11:50 AM 2/24/98 +0100, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>A little nit-picking:
>
>- There is a need for an 'pretty online' service to find out the
>  status of certificates. One might consider to define this service
>  without referencing to http, and then selecting http
>  as 'use of lower layers'.
>  In the actual text these things seems to be tied together.
>
>- The mentioned keyword/value pairs might be given as such
>  (using whatever textual means to describe it) but not in
>  the rather implicit way through its encoding in an http request.
>
>- The text should be written in ASCII or ISO-latin-1 (not with
>  quotes coming from some well known word-processing-$ware.)
>
>- In the description of a request, there is a definition of
>  'time' which is not used anywhere?
>
>Peter Sylvester -- EdelWeb France
>