[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft

To: IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft
From: John Pawling <jsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 13:38:22 -0500
Approved-by: John Pawling <jsp@JGVANDYKE.COM>
Reply-to: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Robert,

Does Nortel/Entrust have a patent on the protocols described in the Notary
Protocols I-D (draft-adams-notary-01.txt)??  Is Nortel/Entrust in the
process of applying for a patent on the Notary Protocols described in the
draft??  Does Nortel/Entrust have any plans to apply for a patent on the
Notary Protocols described in the draft??

================================
John Pawling
jsp@jgvandyke.com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.
================================

Prev by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates
Next by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures
Previous by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft
Next by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread