Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes

[Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Marc.  The text is essentially the equivalent of the Utah text.

I'm still interested if anyone finds any others, but the next question is
whether any CA or CA toolkit is presently including such an attribute in their
certs.

Bob



Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com> scrawled:
>
> Is anyone aware of any legislation, passed or pending, which takes any legal
> recognition of a "Reliance Limit", other than the Utah Digital Signature Act?
>
> I would be particularly interested to learn of any non-US jurisdictions who m
> ight be interested in  this.
>

Last I saw it, the Washington State Electronic Authentication Act called for
reliance limits.  Surfez-vous to

        http://leginfo.leg.wa.gov/pub/rcw/title_19/chapter_034/

Reliance limits are specifically discussed in rcw_19_34_280.