[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate

To: IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <paulh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:01:34 -0700
Approved-by: Paul Hoffman / IMC <paulh@IMC.ORG>
In-reply-to: <>
Reply-to: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "IETF X.509-based public key infrastructure mailing list" <IETF-PKIX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I agree with David Kemp's analysis and take back my suggestion that
wasIssued be mandatory.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

References:
- Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate
  - From: David P. Kemp

Prev by Date: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers
Next by Date: New location for the mailing list
Previous by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate
Next by thread: Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread