[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CMP issue and question

To: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
Subject: CMP issue and question
From: Michael_Shanzer@xxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 12:07:08 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx

In draft-ietf-pkix-ipki3cmp-08.txt the "Direct TCP Management Protocol"
defines polling times to be an absolute time.
   I think it would be better to make it a relative time. Less time skew
issues etc.

 Also, if the CA issues a certificate that has a value specified (start
time, or some random extension) that the end entity
 did not specify would that be considered Granted or GrantedWithMods. I can
argue either way.


                         Mike

Prev by Date: ETS Project on time-stamping
Next by Date: Re: x.509 v3 Certificates and Compatbility
Previous by thread: ETS Project on time-stamping
Next by thread: Re: CMP issue and question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread