RE: On Hold

[salzr@xxxxxxxxxx]

>Certificate path validation software it trying to generate a binary
>answer:
>the path is valid or it is not valid.  To me, "on hold" creates a >maybe.
>For this reason, I really dislike "on hold."

I view path processing as a separate (prior) step to checking on
certificate status.  I also do not see it as being appropriate
for a CA, only "end-user" (or server) certs.  Given that, it seems highly
appropriate, at least in the financial area.
	/r$