personal identifiers

[Robert Malick <rmalick@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Excerpts from mail: 18-Dec-98 Re: Qualified Certificates .. Stefan
Santesson@accurat (1834*)

> We decided during Orlando to go with dnQualifier instead of serialNumber.
> It seams that there is a majority supporting that choice.

> /Stefan

> At 04:14 PM 12/11/98 -0500, Ella P. Gardner wrote:
> >Some folks don't like the fact that the X.500 standard unique identifier is
> >a bit string. That's why we used dnQualifier in the Allied Communications
> >Publication 133.
> >
> >Ella

Could someone deny or confirm that what was once "uniqueIdentifier" in
X.500 is now "X500UniqueIdentifier". I belive the name was changed and
the OID is the same as it was thus no conflict.

We are planning to use "uniqueIdentifier" as is defined in RFC 1274 (and
LIPS) in our directory services (as future certificates) and thought
that this point was mute now.

With the latest discussions, I'm not sure now.

	Rob