Archive of ietf-pkix/old-archive-98, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-pkix/old-archive-98
Page 2 of 6
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?, (continued)
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Ed Gerck
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Robert Klerer
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Sievänen Markku
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Sarbari Gupta
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
r1naray
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Sarbari Gupta
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- RE: NEW Data type for certificate selection ?,
Alan Lloyd
- Re: basic constraint extension,
Peter Gutmann
- X.509 Documentation,
CryptoNEWS
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tls-ac509prof-00.txt,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Revised LDAPv2 specs have been submitted,
Sharon Boeyen
- Archive cutoff & Retention period,
Denis Pinkas
- Minor comments on OCSP-06,
Denis Pinkas
- Amending the PKIX-WG Charter to reflect the addition of timestamping,
Todd S. Glassey
- text for attributes,
Sharon Boeyen
- meeting minutes,
Stephen Kent
- OCSP - Public Key Dstribution,
Anders Rundgren
- Who uses what?,
Jan Willemson
- proposed text for attributes,
Sharon Boeyen
- fast review of draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt,
Peter Sylvester
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-06.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- Storage of CA Certificates in LDAP and X.500 Directory Attributes,
Santosh Chokhani
- Schema Straw Poll Closure,
Warwick Ford
- UTF8String definition in PKIX-3,
Trevor Sosebee
- Testing the ASN.1 in Part 1,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- OCSP ASN.1 comments,
Andreas Berger
- RE: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method O,
Graham Bland
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-00.txt,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- PKIX transports using HTTP,
Shailesh
- PKIX Certificate Management Protocols,
Abhay Kulkarni
- New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Mike Smith
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Denis Pinkas
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Fillingham, David W.
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Santosh Chokhani
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Mike Smith
- RE: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Fillingham, David W.
- RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Mike Smith
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Mike Smith
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Mike Smith
- RE: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Charles Moore
- Re: RE: New Extension Proposed: Method Of Authentication,
Stefan Santesson
- For Option none,
Denis Pinkas
- RE: OFF TOPIC ???? RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelopment complexity s),
Alan Lloyd
- OCSP in Chicago,
Ambarish Malpani
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- forward & reverse elements - population,
Sharon Boeyen
- Re: forward & reverse elements - population,
David Boyce
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
PACHL, Jan
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
PACHL, Jan
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Kurn, David
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Kurn, David
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Kurn, David
- RE: forward & reverse elements - population,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: PKIX freeware library coming soon (fwd),
Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: path development complexity s),
Lynn.Wheeler
- depth,
Pavel Krylov
- Re relational - and Dirs and all that,
Alan Lloyd
- Re: RE: Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE:pathdevelopment complexity s),
Mike Smith
- Relational vs Directory Repository Models (was RE: pathdevelopment complexity s),
Mike Smith
- Internet Directory Consortium call for participation in DirConnect3,
CliveBetteridge
- Re: path development complexity,
Robert Klerer
- FOR Option2,
Paul Ma
- Heads Up - Historic digital signing ceremony,
Bill Brice
- [no subject],
John_Wray
- TemporalData (Time Stamp Protocol),
Denis Pinkas
- RE: path development complexity (was Re: What the straw poll means),
Alan Lloyd
- RE: Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means),
Alan Lloyd
- Voting Question,
John Everson
- For Option 2.,
Tuttle, Kimberly (OSSC)
- Let's try to understand the real issue (was... RE: What the straw poll means),
Carlisle Adams
- RE: Where to store CA certificates,
Sharon Boeyen
- For Option #2,
WHenry
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D,
Sharon Boeyen
- What the straw poll means,
Bob Jueneman
- Re: What the straw poll means,
Bill Burr
- Re: What the straw poll means,
Stephen Kent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Bob Jueneman
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
John_Wray
- Re: What the straw poll means,
Dave Horvath
- Re: What the straw poll means,
Bob Jueneman
- Re: What the straw poll means,
Dave Horvath
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
John Everson
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Stefan Santesson
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: What the straw poll means,
Peter Sylvester
- RE: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PK IX LDAPv2 schema I-D,
Sharon Boeyen
- Extension of straw poll,
Sharon Boeyen
- Option 1,
Nora Kraemer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Option 1,
Susan Joseph
- option 2,
DGrawrock
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes-PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D,
Bob Jueneman
- For Option 2,
Robert Zuccherato
- <Possible follow-ups>
- For Option 2,
Stephen Farrell
- for option 2,
MHenry
- For Option 2,
Carlisle Adams
- For Option 2,
Ron Chittaro
- for option 2,
Greg Byrd
- For Option 2,
Eduardo Rosemberg de Moura
- For Option 2,
Mike Just
- For Option 2,
Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
- For Option 2,
Thomas Caldenius
- For Option 2,
Martin Lindström
- For Option 2,
Stefan Santesson
- For option 2,
Jesse Walker
- For Option 2,
John_Wray
- For Option 2,
Mark C Davis
- For Option 2,
Saylor, John
- For Option 2,
Sharon Boeyen
- For Option 2,
Serge Mister
- For Option 2,
Pawluk, Jean
- For Option 2,
Ivan Milman
- For Option 2,
Bruce Greenblatt
- For Option 2,
Joe Tardo
- For Option 2,
Peter Yeatrakas
- For Option 2,
Eric Rosenquist
- For Option 2,
MA Crane
- For Option 2,
PACHL, Jan
- For Option 2,
John Everson
- For Option 2,
Peter Lindstrom
- For Option 2,
Mary_Ellen_Zurko
- For Option 2,
Rainer Rueppel
- For Option 2,
Robert Sabourin
- For Option 2,
David Solo
- For Option 2,
Susan Lang
- For Option 2,
Bill Burr
- For Option 2,
Evans, Jim (OSSC)
- For Option 2,
Eaton, James (EATO)
- For Option 2,
Tony Bates
- For Option 2,
Rene Eberhard
- For Option 2,
Steve O'Neil
- For Option 2,
Edmond.vanHees
- For Option 2,
Pamela Grannum
- For Option 2,
Power, Michael: LEG
- For Option 2,
Erin Connor
- For Option 2,
Larry Shomo
- For Option 2,
JF Sauriol
- For Option 2,
John Hughes
- For Option 2,
Smith, David
- For Option 2,
Salmond, Kent
- For option 2,
Surendra Reddy
- For Option 2,
Jorgen Moller
- For Option 2,
Svein Løseth
- FOR OPTION 2,
Ton van Lieshout
- For Option 2,
Jeremy Bingham
- for Option 2,
John A. DiDuro
- For option 2,
DeRosenroll.Michael
- For Option 2,
tjcasar
- For Option 2,
jplachance
- For Option 2,
Jean_Bernatchez
- For Option 2,
Dimitri.Vekris
- For option 2,
David Giglio
- For Option 2,
Dimitri.Vekris
- For Option 2,
rpierce
- For Option 2,
Daya Puls
- FOR Option 2,
Fuerst, Neal
- For Option 2,
Ross_Smith
- For Option 2,
Alan_Buffett
- For Option 2,
David Boyce
- For Option 2,
randy.sanovic
- For Option 2,
Corcoran, Dan
- For Option 2,
William Dziadyk
- Re: Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePairattributes- PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D,
Bob Jueneman
- For Option 1,
Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems
- <Possible follow-ups>
- For Option 1,
John Pawling
- For Option 1,
Larry Layten
- For Option 1,
Thomas Llanso
- For Option 1,
Steven (Pete) Peterson
- For Option 1,
Rogers III, Edward B.
- For Option 1,
Michael Maloney
- For Option 1,
Fillingham, David W.
- For Option 1,
Dave Horvath
- For Option 1,
Fabio Omenigrandi
- For Option 1,
Russel F. Weiser
- for Option 1,
Barb Fox
- For Option 1,
Adkins, Sherrill
- For Option 1,
Brian LaMacchia
- For Option 1,
Sean Mullan
- For Option 1,
Michael Myers
- For Option 1,
Santosh Chokhani
- For Option 1,
Trevor Freeman
- For Option 1,
Yuriy Dzambasow
- For Option 1,
Pavel Krylov
- for option 1,
Elliott N Ginsburg
- For Option 1,
John Garner
- For Option 1,
Ella P. Gardner
- For Option 1,
Chris Vance
- For Option 1,
David Berstein
- for option 1,
Bruce Bell
- For Option 1,
Bill Lenz
- For Option 1,
Hirsch Matthew
- For Option 1,
David Dalkowski
- For Option 1,
Tom Horvath
- For Option 1,
susanmaloney
- For Option 1,
SLucch3390
- For Option 1,
Peter Hesse
- For Option 1,
Karen Oostendorp
- For Option 1,
Peter Brundrett
- For Option 1,
Kenneth Eggers
- For Option 1,
Rick Johnson
- for Option 1,
Charles Moore
- For Option 1,
Maloney, Teresa A.
- For Option 1,
Carl Wallace
- For Option 1,
bgmiller
- For Option 1,
Richard Pimental
- For Option 1,
Chris Francis
- For option 1,
Boby Joseph
- For Option 1,
Les Mitchell
- for option 1,
Andrea Sansone
- For Option 1,
Russ Housley
- Straw Poll cACertificate & crossCertificatePair attributes - PKIX LDAPv2 schema I-D,
Sharon Boeyen
- fwd: Re: ...no subject...,
Fred Gloade Hrdc-drhc
- ACM Comp. and Comm. Security: Reg-n Form and Call for Participation,
Gene Tsudik
- Digital signature and non-repudiation key usage bits,
Bob Jueneman
- PKIX draft for Non-Repudiation certificates,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, andephemeralvs.permanent key usage,
Bob Jueneman
- RE title change : directory enabled certificate status draft,
Alan Lloyd
- PKIX Roadmap,
Sean Turner
- directory enabled certificate status draft,
Alan Lloyd
- CMC/CRMF: RSA key transport and PKCS #1,
Linn, John
- Re: CMC Comments,
Michael Myers
- RE: Finding paths, Was:Re: Domains of Trust for PKIX,
Alan Lloyd
- Defining Non-Repudiation,
Tony Bartoletti
- Australian Government Public Key Authority certification crieria,
Tegart, Alistair
- PKIX LDAPv3 Schema questions,
Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems
- OCSP Implementations,
Tom Arnold
- block padding formats,
Petra Glöckner
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs. permanent key usage,
Peter Gutmann
- Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Bob Jueneman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Simonetti David
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Petra Glöckner
- RE: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Petra Glöckner
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Simonetti David
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Petra Glöckner
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Denis Pinkas
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Petra Glöckner
- SV: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Hans Nilsson
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Petra Glöckner
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Re: Authentication vs. binding signature, and ephemeral vs.permanent key usage,
Aram Perez
- Domains of Trust for PKIX,
Mike Smith
- Re: Last Call: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile to Proposed Standard,
Stefan Santesson
- Web CAP,
Andreas Berger
- OCSP - Wait A Minute!,
Anders Rundgren
- OCSP questions,
Tom Arnold
- Status of OCSP WG Last Call?,
Tom Arnold
- new ECDSA draft,
Tim Polk
- PKIX Chicago Agenda,
Warwick Ford
- CMP issue and question,
Michael_Shanzer
- ETS Project on time-stamping,
Jose A. Manas
- Re: Last Call: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile to Proposed Standard,
Francois Leclerc
Page 2 of 6
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.