Archive of ietf-pkix/old-archive-98, by thread

• Filling in the archives, Paul Hoffman / IMC
• New location for the mailing list, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New location for the mailing list, Warwick Ford
• [IETF-PKIX] PKIX - Operational Protocols through WebCAP, Surendra Reddy
• [IETF-PKIX] pkix subject \ issuer names and RFC2247, Trevor Freeman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] pkix subject \ issuer names and RFC2247, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] PKIX Operational protocols through WebCAP, S.Reddy Virtual Office
• [IETF-PKIX] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-opp-ftp-http-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unencumbered PKIX Minutes (Was: RE: [IETF-PKIX] D raft LA Minutes), Flanigan, Bill
• [IETF-PKIX] INFOSEC'COM 98, Denis Pinkas
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unencumbered PKIX Minutes (Was: RE: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes), Warwick Ford
• [IETF-PKIX] Unencumbered PKIX Minutes (Was: RE: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes), Flanigan, Bill
• [IETF-PKIX] Definition of Secure Initialization, Michael Myers
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Extended Error States in Responses, Ambarish Malpani
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Ambarish Malpani
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Marc Branchaud
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Semantics of thisUpdate, nextUpdate, producedAt, Dale Gustafson
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Tim Polk
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Jeff Weinstein
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David Boyce
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Marc Branchaud
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Slava Galperin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, John Wray
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Paul Koning
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Peter Sylvester
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, John_Wray
  • RE: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Trevor Freeman
    • RE: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, John_Wray
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Ambarish Malpani
      • new profile submitted, Tim Polk
      • Re: new profile submitted, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: new profile submitted, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • KeyUsage (keyEncipherment versus dataEncipherment), Petra Glöckner
      • Re: KeyUsage (keyEncipherment versus dataEncipherment), Stephen Kent
      • Re: KeyUsage (keyEncipherment versus dataEncipherment), Russ Housley
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, John_Wray
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP: Method of Identifying Certificates, Denis Pinkas
• [IETF-PKIX] Types of OCSP Responders, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Types of OCSP Responders, Denis Pinkas
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Slava Galperin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Andreas Berger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Alexei V. Vopilov
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Michael Myers
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Ambarish Malpani
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Andreas Berger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, SGalperin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Status Information on a Certificate, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Usage Scenarios, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Usage Scenarios, Marc Branchaud
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Usage Scenarios, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Usage Scenarios, Slava Galperin
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Ambarish Malpani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Stephen Farrell
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Jeff Weinstein
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Denis Pinkas
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP at IETF, Ambarish Malpani
• [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Draft LA Minutes, Carlisle Adams
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Marc Branchaud
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, Mike Smith
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and HTTP proxy caching, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] Some observations - technical and notTechnical, Flanigan, Bill
• [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
  • Message not available
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, John Day
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, John Day
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Perry E. Metzger
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bill Burr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Flanigan, Bill
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
    • Message not available
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Christian Huitema
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Scott Bradner
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Tony Rutkowski
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Todd Glassey
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 2028 and Nortel Patent 5699431, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
• [IETF-PKIX] Key Usage Role in Cert Path Validation, Simonetti David
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, John Pawling
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Simonetti David
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Kevin Kingdon
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Ian Roberts
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Sean Turner
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Rich Ankney
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Ian Roberts
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Moshe Litvin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Tony Bartoletti
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Enforcing constraints, Mark Shuttleworth
• [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Russ Housley
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Anil R. Gangolli
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Simonetti David
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Removing Extensions from PKIX Part 1, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Sean Turner
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Andreas Berger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema - object classes for users and CAs, Sharon Boeyen
• [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, John Pawling
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Polk
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Dierks
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Stephen Kent
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Tim Polk
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Andreas Berger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Denis Pinkas
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Russ Housley
  • [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Tim Polk
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Sean Turner
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Andreas Berger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Paul Koning
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Key Identifiers, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, John Hughes
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, John_Wray
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • FW: [IETF-PKIX] Subject/Issuer Name Population, Blake Ramsdell
• [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CMP-07, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CMP-07, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• [IETF-PKIX] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [IETF-PKIX] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-part1-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS, Mark Shuttleworth
• [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Brian Korver
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Polk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Rich Ankney
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Dierks
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Tim Polk
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX1 inconsistent with PKCS1, Brian Korver
• [IETF-PKIX] Definition of short OIDs in Distinguished Names, Andreas Berger
• [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Denis Pinkas
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] LDAP v2 schema, Sharon Boeyen
• [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, Graham Bland
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, Paul Koning
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, Tony Bartoletti
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, Paul Koning
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Criticality of extensions, Tony Bartoletti
• [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Michael Roe
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Hal Lockhart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Paul Koning
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Robert Moskowitz
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Robert Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Tony Bartoletti
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Duct-taping X.509, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Trevor Freeman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Rich Ankney
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Tony Bartoletti
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Darryl Stal
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Babelfish and names, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Tagging problems, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Tagging problems, Charles W. Gardiner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Tagging problems, Peter Gutmann
• [IETF-PKIX] Suspended Certificate in CRL, Gatto_Giorgio
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Suspended Certificate in CRL, Petra Glöckner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Suspended Certificate in CRL, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Critical flag processing (was: Re: RE: Signed Label ), Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Critical flag processing (was: Re: RE: Signed Label ), Paul Koning
• [IETF-PKIX] Error in draft-ietf-pkix-crmf-00.txt, Francisco Jordan
• [IETF-PKIX] PLEASE FIX, Pawluk, Jean
• [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Moshe Litvin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Peter Gutmann
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Moshe Litvin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, pgut001
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Moshe Litvin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Peter Gutmann
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Moshe Litvin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Questions about PKCS #10 and cert extensions, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] Archives?, Andy Nourse
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] [CERT-TALK] Subject line tag, David P. Kemp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] [CERT-TALK] Subject line tag, Brian M. Thomas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] [CERT-TALK] Subject line tag, Paul Koning
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] [CERT-TALK] Subject line tag, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Patent 5699431, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Patent 5699431, Perry E. Metzger
• [no subject], David P. Kemp
  • [no subject], Perry E. Metzger
    • [no subject], Tony Bartoletti
• [no subject], Stephen Samson
  • [no subject], Perry E. Metzger
• [IETF-PKIX] data to/from X.509, Valentin Oprean
• [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Draft CMC-00, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Draft CMC-00, Michael Myers
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] [E-CARM] PKI, CAs, TTPs &c., George Capehart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] [E-CARM] PKI, CAs, TTPs &c., Biddle, Bradford
• [IETF-PKIX] agenda for next weeks meetings, Jeff Weinstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] agenda for next weeks meetings, Warwick Ford
• [IETF-PKIX] Belated Post Response, Tony Bartoletti
• [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CRMF-00, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CRMF-00, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CRMF-00, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on CRMF-00, Carlisle Adams
• [IETF-PKIX] Cross certification question, Bengtsson Jim
• [IETF-PKIX] Using PKIX, Frederik Loeckx
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Using PKIX, Russ Housley
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Using PKIX, Stephen Kent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Using PKIX, Carlisle Adams
• [IETF-PKIX] Comments on draft CMMF-00, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Paul Hoffman / IMC
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Paul Koning
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Carlisle Adams
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Russ Housley
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP Update, Marc Branchaud
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Carlisle Adams
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Stephen Kent
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Denis Pinkas
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Stephen Kent
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements (and new straw poll...), Stephen Kent
• [IETF-PKIX] New CertUID (was: Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSPRequirements), Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, Slava Galperin
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, Denis Pinkas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Unique Identification of a Certificate, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] We voted, now what?, Rich Salz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] We voted, now what?, Michael Myers
• [IETF-PKIX] Question about CMMF, Jakob Bjerre Jensen
• [IETF-PKIX] Current Tally on OCSP using ASN.1, Michael Myers
• [IETF-PKIX] Question about the CMMF/CMRF drafts, Jim Schaad (Exchange)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Question about the CMMF/CMRF drafts, Carlisle Adams
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Hal Lockhart
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Russ Housley
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Bruce Greenblatt
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Paul Koning
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Peter Gutmann
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on pkix-ipki-part1, Paul Koning
• [IETF-PKIX] Obtaining a certificate for user B., Jakob Bjerre Jensen
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Dave Horvath
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Hal Lockhart
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Ambarish Malpani
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Todd Glassey
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Slava Galperin
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Matthew S. Hamrick
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Nada Kapidzic Cicovic
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Russ Housley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Mike Smith
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Kevin Kingdon
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Boby Joseph
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, John Pawling
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Robert Zuccherato
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Carlisle Adams
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, John Lowry
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Charles W. Gardiner
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, cmoore
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Charles Blauner
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP ASN.1 Poll, Jeff Weinstein
• [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Russ Housley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Peter Sylvester
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Denis Pinkas
      • [IETF-PKIX] New CertUID (was: Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements), Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, Peter Gutmann
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New OCSP Requirements, David Chadwick
• [IETF-PKIX] Wouldnt adding a certified timestamp kill the issues re: multiple keys/certificates, Todd Glassey
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Wouldnt adding a certified timestamp kill the issues re: multiple keys/certificates, Stephen Kent
• [IETF-PKIX] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldapv2-schema-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and RCSP, Rich Ankney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP and RCSP, David P. Kemp
• [IETF-PKIX] Comments on sixth draft of IPKI X.509 Certificate and CRL Profile, Tirthankar Barari
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on sixth draft of IPKI X.509 Certificate and CRL Profile, Stephen Kent
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP alternative comments, Michael Myers
• [IETF-PKIX] New Draft for Checking the Status of a Certificate - RCSP, Ambarish Malpani
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName, Stephen Kent
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and, Paul Hoffman / IMC
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and, Stephen Kent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and, Mike Smith
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Paul Hoffman / IMC
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Rich Salz
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Warwick Ford
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Michael Myers
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Carlisle Adams
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Warwick Ford
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and otherextensions, Robert Jueneman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and otherextensions, Mike Smith
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] RFC 822 names in SubjectAltName and otherextensions, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] CMMF and CMC drafts, Michael Myers
  • [IETF-PKIX] URLs for CMMF and CMC drafts, Denis Pinkas
• [IETF-PKIX] New Time Stamp Protocols Draft, Robert Zuccherato
• [IETF-PKIX] Revised draft-ietf-pkix-ipki2opp-07.txt, Sharon Boeyen
• [IETF-PKIX] Cross Certification and SEP protocol, berlen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cross Certification and SEP protocol, Carlisle Adams
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Fwd: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates (resend), Lynn Wheeler
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates tosignatures, Bob Jueneman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates tosignatures, lars.gu.johansson
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates tosignatures, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures, Denis Pinkas
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates tosignatures, Stephen Kent
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates tosignatures, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, berlen
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Marc Branchaud
    • [IETF-PKIX] Bad signature? (was: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes), Marc Branchaud
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Andreas Berger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, berlen
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
  • [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Dwight Arthur
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Perry E. Metzger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Andrew Csinger
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, John Horton
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Perry E. Metzger
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Bob Jueneman
  • [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Scott Guthery
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Perry E. Metzger
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Reliance limits in statutes, Stephen Kent
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Fwd: Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Bob Jueneman
• [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, John Hughes
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, Andrew Csinger
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, Tony Bartoletti
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, Dan Geer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, Peter Whittaker
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, Bob Jueneman
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] What is a PKI, John Hughes
• [IETF-PKIX] PKIX questions (DH key and Key Identifier), John Hughes
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX questions (DH key and Key Identifier), David Boyce
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX questions (DH key and Key Identifier), David Boyce
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] PKIX questions (DH key and Key Identifier), Anil R. Gangolli
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures, David P. Kemp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures, Brian M. Thomas
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Cryptographic binding of certificates to signatures, lars.gu.johansson
• [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Robert Zuccherato
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Stephen P. Wilson
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Stephen P. Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Robert Zuccherato
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Rich Ankney
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, John Pawling
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, John Pawling
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Rich Ankney
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Robert Zuccherato
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Robert Zuccherato
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] New Notary Protocol Draft, Robert Zuccherato
    • [IETF-PKIX] The argument for using NTPv4 as one of the basis of Certified Time in PKIX-land, Todd Glassey
      • Re: [IETF-PKIX] The argument for using NTPv4 as one of the basis of Certified Time in PKIX-land, Hal Lockhart
• [IETF-PKIX] OCSP using ASN.1, Ambarish Malpani
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP using ASN.1, Peter Sylvester
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP using ASN.1, Michael Myers
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] OCSP using ASN.1, Ambarish Malpani
      • [IETF-PKIX] Comments on Malpani and PKIX OCSP drafts, Anil R. Gangolli
• [IETF-PKIX] registering company object identifiers, Michael Leahy
• Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, David P. Kemp
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Paul Koning
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Tony Bartoletti
    • [IETF-PKIX] new draft of certificate profile, Tim Polk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Arsenault, Al W.
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Paul Koning
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Tony Bartoletti
      • [IETF-PKIX] OCSP in ASN.1, Ambarish Malpani
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, David P. Kemp
    • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Tony Bartoletti
  • Re: [IETF-PKIX] Multiple Certificates, Brian M. Thomas

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.