Archive of ietf-pkix/old-archive-99, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-pkix/old-archive-99

Page 5 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Timestamp: GeneralizedTime, Manger, James, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, tgindin, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Stephen Kent, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 15:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Stephen Kent, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Ambarish Malpani, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 15:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, David P. Kemp, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Ben Laurie, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Hemma Prafullchandra, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
RE: attribute encryption (was: Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Linn, John, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Peter Gutmann, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Bill Burr, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Stephen Kent, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Stephen Kent, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Stephen Kent, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, David P. Kemp, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Keith Brady, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Brian M. Thomas, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: attribute encryption (was: Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Bob Blakley, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Ben Laurie, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Keith Brady, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Keith Brady, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Jeff Brinskelle, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Ben Laurie, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Tom Biskupic, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, David P. Kemp, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Ambarish Malpani, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 10:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate requests for encryption keys, Bob Jueneman, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 10:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Re[2]: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General form, Lynn.Wheeler, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Re[2]: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General form, Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
Certificate requests for encryption keys, Ilan Shacham, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Russ Housley, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 05:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, John_Wray, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 05:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Re[2]: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General form, veikko.punkka, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 04:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Tom Biskupic, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 03:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 01:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Ambarish Malpani, Tue, 8 Jun 1999 00:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Alex Deacon, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 20:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 16:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Problem with RFC 2459?, Ambarish Malpani, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Possible clarification to RFC 2459, Ambarish Malpani, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-ecdsa-01.txt, Tim Polk, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Possible clarification to RFC 2459, tgindin, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
RE: DoD X.509 Certificate Policy, Gerretson, Jim, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
RE: DoD X.509 Certificate Policy, Fillingham, David W., Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-ecdsa-01.txt, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 07:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
RE: DoD X.509 Certificate Policy, Sweigert, David, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 07:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Assigning Roles to Strangers, yosimass, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 04:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-ecdsa-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, Mon, 7 Jun 1999 04:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Sun, 6 Jun 1999 22:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Mutiple O and OU in the Distinguish Name, u8142010, Sun, 6 Jun 1999 20:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Sun, 6 Jun 1999 17:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ben Laurie, Sun, 6 Jun 1999 04:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Problem with RFC 2459?, Russ Housley, Sat, 5 Jun 1999 08:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Sat, 5 Jun 1999 00:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 19:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Fw: authorityKeyIdentifier and subjectkeyIdentifier inplement in the real case or model, u8142010, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 17:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 16:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Lynn.Wheeler, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Lynn.Wheeler, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
DoD X.509 Certificate Policy, Sweigert, David, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
RE: authorityKeyIdentifier and subjectkeyIdentifier inplement in the real case or model, Jim Schaad (Exchange), Fri, 4 Jun 1999 11:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Summary, was Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 09:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 07:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
authorityKeyIdentifier and subjectkeyIdentifier inplement in the real case or model, u8142010, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 02:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 02:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Fri, 4 Jun 1999 00:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Andrew Probert, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 13:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Problem with RFC 2459?, Ambarish Malpani, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
pki, Matt Paschal, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 08:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Information on National Association of Review Appraisers, IAMI, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 07:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ben Laurie, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 02:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 3 Jun 1999 00:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, David Chia, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 23:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
RE: good example, was Re: Every time ..., Alan Lloyd, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 22:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
good example, was Re: Every time ..., Ed Gerck, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 22:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Every time ..for ammusement only, Alan Lloyd, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Jose A. Manas, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 20:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Terry Hayes, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Information on National Association of Mortgage Underwriters, IAMI, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Sarbari Gupta, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Every time ..., was Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 11:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Sarbari Gupta, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Inclusion of a Status code within a TSAToken, Sarbari Gupta, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Re: How do software products handle policy qualifiers?, Stephen Kent, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
How do software products handle policy qualifiers?, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 07:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
The purpose of time stamping, Jose A. Manas, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 00:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Assigning Roles to Strangers, yosimass, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 00:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 2 Jun 1999 00:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
RE: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 23:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 23:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
RE: General formula, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Christopher Stacy, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 20:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, Ed Gerck, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 20:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Linguistics, was Re: General formula, was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes:way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Ed Gerck, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Peter Williams, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
identifying and indexing certs, was Re: X.509 ACs ..., Ed Gerck, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 14:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce informationin TSA responses?, Shabnam Erfani, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 13:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Sarbari Gupta, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Sarbari Gupta, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Aram Perez, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 09:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Fillingham, David W., Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: attribute encryption (was: Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Stephen Farrell, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-extend-trust-non-repudiation-token-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 04:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 04:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Darren Harter, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 01:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Error in encoding of DSA signature in RFC 2459?, Darren Harter, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 01:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: attribute encryption (was: Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Denis Pinkas, Tue, 1 Jun 1999 00:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
CA Liabilty - How does it REALLY work?, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 31 May 1999 04:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Peter Sylvester, Mon, 31 May 1999 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Error in encoding of DSA signature in RFC 2459?, Ilan Shacham, Sun, 30 May 1999 08:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Moshe Litvin, Sun, 30 May 1999 05:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Sat, 29 May 1999 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ed Gerck, Fri, 28 May 1999 18:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
our meeting slots in Oslo, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 15:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Flanigan, Bill, Fri, 28 May 1999 13:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 28 May 1999 13:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 12:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Aram Perez, Fri, 28 May 1999 11:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 11:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, tgindin, Fri, 28 May 1999 10:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Farrell, Fri, 28 May 1999 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Aram Perez, Fri, 28 May 1999 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Aram Perez, Fri, 28 May 1999 09:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Fri, 28 May 1999 08:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Fri, 28 May 1999 07:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Anders Rundgren, Fri, 28 May 1999 06:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
attribute encryption (was: Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Stephen Farrell, Fri, 28 May 1999 04:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 28 May 1999 03:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Farrell, Fri, 28 May 1999 03:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Farrell, Fri, 28 May 1999 03:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Stephen Farrell, Fri, 28 May 1999 03:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 28 May 1999 02:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 28 May 1999 02:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
R: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Santoni Adriano, Thu, 27 May 1999 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Thu, 27 May 1999 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Paper (was RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Ellison, Carl M, Thu, 27 May 1999 14:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Dale Gustafson, Thu, 27 May 1999 11:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Aram Perez, Thu, 27 May 1999 11:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Stephen Kent, Thu, 27 May 1999 10:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Thu, 27 May 1999 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
DN's (was Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?), Carl Ellison, Thu, 27 May 1999 09:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Thu, 27 May 1999 09:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Carl Ellison, Thu, 27 May 1999 09:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Terry Hayes, Thu, 27 May 1999 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Thu, 27 May 1999 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
RE: how to determine tstTime in time-stamp?, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 27 May 1999 08:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Fillingham, David W., Thu, 27 May 1999 08:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Salz, Rich, Thu, 27 May 1999 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Thu, 27 May 1999 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Anders Rundgren, Thu, 27 May 1999 06:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Petra Gloeckner, Thu, 27 May 1999 05:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: CRL retrieval, mderuyte, Thu, 27 May 1999 05:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 27 May 1999 04:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 27 May 1999 04:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
how to determine tstTime in time-stamp?, gang cao, Thu, 27 May 1999 02:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Hoyt.Kesterson, Thu, 27 May 1999 01:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., tgindin, Wed, 26 May 1999 16:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Certificate life-cycle costs., Alan Lloyd, Wed, 26 May 1999 16:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Stefan Santesson, Wed, 26 May 1999 15:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Peter Gutmann, Wed, 26 May 1999 15:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Wed, 26 May 1999 15:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes:way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Bob Blakley, Wed, 26 May 1999 14:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, Bob Blakley, Wed, 26 May 1999 14:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Russ Housley, Wed, 26 May 1999 13:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., tgindin, Wed, 26 May 1999 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Hoyt.Kesterson, Wed, 26 May 1999 12:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Blakley, Wed, 26 May 1999 11:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Peter Williams, Wed, 26 May 1999 10:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Jueneman, Wed, 26 May 1999 10:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 26 May 1999 09:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 26 May 1999 09:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
REMINDER: CFP: ISOC Year 2000 Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS 2000), David M. Balenson, Wed, 26 May 1999 07:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Wed, 26 May 1999 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-bert1-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, Wed, 26 May 1999 06:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Trying again: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Stefan Santesson, Wed, 26 May 1999 00:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Juergen Brauckmann, Tue, 25 May 1999 23:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes:way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Ed Gerck, Tue, 25 May 1999 20:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Carl Ellison, Tue, 25 May 1999 19:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Hoyt.Kesterson, Tue, 25 May 1999 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ed Gerck, Tue, 25 May 1999 16:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ed Gerck, Tue, 25 May 1999 16:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Re: General formula, was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes: way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Graham Klyne, Tue, 25 May 1999 15:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ellison, Carl M, Tue, 25 May 1999 13:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Tue, 25 May 1999 12:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on time-stamp-01: Use of PolicyInformation, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 25 May 1999 12:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Ed Gerck, Tue, 25 May 1999 12:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on time-stamp-01: Use of PolicyInformation, Stephen Kent, Tue, 25 May 1999 12:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on time-stamp-01: Use of PolicyInformation, Terry Hayes, Tue, 25 May 1999 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 25 May 1999 11:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 25 May 1999 11:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Terry Hayes, Tue, 25 May 1999 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on time-stamp-01: Use of PolicyInformation, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 25 May 1999 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Tue, 25 May 1999 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Hoyt.Kesterson, Tue, 25 May 1999 10:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 25 May 1999 10:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Ed Gerck, Tue, 25 May 1999 10:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Anders Rundgren, Tue, 25 May 1999 08:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, David P. Kemp, Tue, 25 May 1999 08:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Re: RFC2459 - CRL signature verification?, Sean Turner, Tue, 25 May 1999 07:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Unsettled topics, Qualified Certificates., Stefan Santesson, Tue, 25 May 1999 05:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
RE: RFC2459 - CRL signature verification?, Darren Harter, Tue, 25 May 1999 02:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Hoyt.Kesterson, Tue, 25 May 1999 00:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
RFC2459 - CRL signature verification?, Sean Turner, Mon, 24 May 1999 20:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Certificate life-cycle costs., Alan Lloyd, Mon, 24 May 1999 19:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 24 May 1999 18:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
tokens anyone ? [DoD PKI], Dave Sweigert, Mon, 24 May 1999 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
RE: CRL retrieval, Dave Sweigert, Mon, 24 May 1999 17:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ellison, Carl M, Mon, 24 May 1999 17:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
RE: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ellison, Carl M, Mon, 24 May 1999 17:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
RE: CRL retrieval, Alan Lloyd, Mon, 24 May 1999 15:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Russ Housley, Mon, 24 May 1999 14:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Comments on time-stamp-01: Identification of TSA, Terry Hayes, Mon, 24 May 1999 13:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Comments on time-stamp-01: Use of PolicyInformation, Terry Hayes, Mon, 24 May 1999 11:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Pamphlet: Smart Card vs. Smart Terminals, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 24 May 1999 01:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
about rfc2585.txt, gang cao, Sun, 23 May 1999 19:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Alan Lloyd, Sun, 23 May 1999 15:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stefan Santesson, Sat, 22 May 1999 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Sat, 22 May 1999 08:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Terry Hayes, Fri, 21 May 1999 19:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Terry Hayes, Fri, 21 May 1999 18:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Ed Gerck, Fri, 21 May 1999 15:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
DirectoryString Encoding, Christopher Oliva, Fri, 21 May 1999 14:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Blakley, Fri, 21 May 1999 13:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Blakley, Fri, 21 May 1999 12:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Certificate life-cycle costs., Linn, John, Fri, 21 May 1999 12:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Ed Gerck, Fri, 21 May 1999 12:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Blakley, Fri, 21 May 1999 11:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Bob Blakley, Fri, 21 May 1999 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Nick Pope, Fri, 21 May 1999 09:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, tgindin, Fri, 21 May 1999 09:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
RE: No subject given, Darren Harter, Fri, 21 May 1999 08:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
[no subject], Nanette Maestre, Fri, 21 May 1999 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
No subject given, william.bamberg, Fri, 21 May 1999 05:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Hoyt.Kesterson, Thu, 20 May 1999 19:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Bob Jueneman, Thu, 20 May 1999 16:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stephen Kent, Thu, 20 May 1999 15:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Stephen Kent, Thu, 20 May 1999 14:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Kurn, David, Thu, 20 May 1999 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Do we need to authenticate error status and nonce information in TSA responses?, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 13:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificatelifetimes, Ed Gerck, Thu, 20 May 1999 12:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Anders Rundgren, Thu, 20 May 1999 12:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Obvious typo in RFC2459, John_Payne, Thu, 20 May 1999 11:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 20 May 1999 11:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 20 May 1999 11:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 20 May 1999 11:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Certificate life-cycle costs., Ed Gerck, Thu, 20 May 1999 11:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificatelifetimes, Peter Williams, Thu, 20 May 1999 10:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 10:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 10:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 20 May 1999 10:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 10:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Data+Status), Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 09:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Rick Wessman, Thu, 20 May 1999 09:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 09:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Jose A. Manas, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Certificate life-cycle costs., Bob Jueneman, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Nick Pope, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 20 May 1999 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Data+Status), Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Data+Status), Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 20 May 1999 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Bob Blakley, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stephen Kent, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Data+Status), Sarbari Gupta, Thu, 20 May 1999 06:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Nick Pope, Thu, 20 May 1999 05:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 20 May 1999 04:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 20 May 1999 03:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 20 May 1999 00:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Jose A. Manas, Wed, 19 May 1999 23:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Ed Gerck, Wed, 19 May 1999 22:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 19 May 1999 20:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificatelifetimes, Ed Gerck, Wed, 19 May 1999 18:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Data+Status), Michael Zolotarev, Wed, 19 May 1999 18:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Why do attr. cert. lifetimes matter?,was Example with sub-attributes, Bob Blakley, Wed, 19 May 1999 12:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Sarbari Gupta, Wed, 19 May 1999 10:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
CRL retrieval, mderuyte, Wed, 19 May 1999 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Bob Jueneman, Wed, 19 May 1999 10:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Re: AC509prof-00. LACResponseMessage, Denis Pinkas, Wed, 19 May 1999 10:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificatelifetimes, Bob Jueneman, Wed, 19 May 1999 08:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
the directory documents for ballot are on the server, Hoyt.Kesterson, Wed, 19 May 1999 07:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 19 May 1999 05:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes, Ed Gerck, Wed, 19 May 1999 05:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Nick Pope, Wed, 19 May 1999 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes, Ron Ramsay, Tue, 18 May 1999 23:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Some comments on PKI toolkit, �̵�ȣ, Tue, 18 May 1999 22:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Example with sub-attributes,was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes, Ed Gerck, Tue, 18 May 1999 22:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Re: QC Interoperability Was: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 18 May 1999 21:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-bert1-00.txt, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Tue, 18 May 1999 19:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes: still way too much math, Ed Gerck, Tue, 18 May 1999 19:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-bert1-00.txt, Stephen Kent, Tue, 18 May 1999 18:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments, Stephen Kent, Tue, 18 May 1999 17:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber), Stephen Kent, Tue, 18 May 1999 17:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Re: QC Interoperability Was: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 18 May 1999 17:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Re: SV: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 18 May 1999 17:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes: still way too much math, David P. Kemp, Tue, 18 May 1999 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-bert1-00.txt, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Tue, 18 May 1999 13:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 18 May 1999 13:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
General formula, was Re: Attribute certificate lifetimes: way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Ed Gerck, Tue, 18 May 1999 12:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 18 May 1999 12:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 18 May 1999 11:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delta CRL size, Tyson Macaulay, Tue, 18 May 1999 08:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Re: On key identifier, Anne Anderson - Sun Microsystems, Tue, 18 May 1999 06:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-bert1-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, Tue, 18 May 1999 06:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
how to use CPS?, gang cao, Mon, 17 May 1999 19:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Bob Blakley, Mon, 17 May 1999 14:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Timestamping: We have submitted a new token structure draft, TSG - Meridianus, Mon, 17 May 1999 12:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Russ Housley, Mon, 17 May 1999 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Todd S. Glassey, Mon, 17 May 1999 10:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Attribute certificate lifetimes: way too much math, but getting closer to correct, Bob Blakley, Mon, 17 May 1999 10:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
QC Interoperability Was: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 17 May 1999 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Re: AC509prof-00. LACResponseMessage, Stephen Farrell, Mon, 17 May 1999 02:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Re: AC509prof-00. LACResponseMessage, Michael Zolotarev, Mon, 17 May 1999 02:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 17 May 1999 01:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Michael Zolotarev, Sun, 16 May 1999 19:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Nick Pope, Sun, 16 May 1999 04:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], yosimass, Sun, 16 May 1999 03:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Re: On key identifier, Peter Gutmann, Sat, 15 May 1999 16:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Peter Gutmann, Sat, 15 May 1999 16:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
SV: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Hans Nilsson, Fri, 14 May 1999 22:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Bob Blakley, Fri, 14 May 1999 15:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs?[draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Anders Rundgren, Fri, 14 May 1999 12:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Fri, 14 May 1999 11:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Attributes within PK certs?[draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Peter Williams, Fri, 14 May 1999 10:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Peter Sylvester, Fri, 14 May 1999 07:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs?[draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Sam Schaen, Fri, 14 May 1999 06:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Russ Housley, Fri, 14 May 1999 05:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stefan Santesson, Fri, 14 May 1999 04:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Peter Sylvester, Fri, 14 May 1999 01:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Jose A. Manas, Thu, 13 May 1999 23:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Jose A. Manas, Thu, 13 May 1999 23:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Re:precisionFactor), Michael Zolotarev, Thu, 13 May 1999 22:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Michael Zolotarev, Thu, 13 May 1999 17:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Re: Protocol), Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 13 May 1999 07:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 13 May 1999 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Robert Zuccherato, Thu, 13 May 1999 06:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Thu, 13 May 1999 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt (Re: Protocol), Michael Zolotarev, Wed, 12 May 1999 19:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments (Re: Tag), Michael Zolotarev, Wed, 12 May 1999 18:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
DoD PKI in the news, Dave Sweigert, Wed, 12 May 1999 18:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments ( Re: serialNumber ), Michael Zolotarev, Wed, 12 May 1999 17:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Attributes within PK certs?, Linn, John, Wed, 12 May 1999 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, tgindin, Wed, 12 May 1999 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 12 May 1999 11:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 12 May 1999 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 12 May 1999 10:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Paul Koning, Wed, 12 May 1999 10:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
RE: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 12 May 1999 10:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Re: X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Carl Ellison, Wed, 12 May 1999 09:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Wed, 12 May 1999 08:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-cmc-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, Wed, 12 May 1999 07:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Re: draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Wed, 12 May 1999 07:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Juan G. de la Vega, Wed, 12 May 1999 04:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
X.509 ACs vs. SPKI?, Ari Huttunen, Wed, 12 May 1999 02:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt comments, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 12 May 1999 01:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Michael Zolotarev, Tue, 11 May 1999 23:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Robert Zuccherato, Tue, 11 May 1999 10:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Re: EncapsulatedContentInfo needs clarification, Brian Korver, Tue, 11 May 1999 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-time-stamp-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, Tue, 11 May 1999 06:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
RE: On key identifier, Darren Harter, Tue, 11 May 1999 03:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ac509 prof-00.txt], Stephen Farrell, Tue, 11 May 1999 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Re: On key identifier, Xiong Shao Jun, Tue, 11 May 1999 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
RE: On key identifier, Darren Harter, Tue, 11 May 1999 01:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs? [RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Anders Rundgren, Mon, 10 May 1999 23:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
On key identifier, Xiong Shao Jun, Mon, 10 May 1999 19:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
EncapsulatedContentInfo needs clarification, Michael Brouwer, Mon, 10 May 1999 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Attributes within PK certs?, David P. Kemp, Mon, 10 May 1999 13:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Attributes within PK certs? [RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt], Linn, John, Mon, 10 May 1999 12:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Fw: Search Engine Privacy Issues, Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Mon, 10 May 1999 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Graham Klyne, Mon, 10 May 1999 04:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Need for TSTokens and who should own the effort, was Re: QC "Certificate Overloading", Anders Rundgren, Sun, 9 May 1999 12:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Need for TSTokens and who should own the effort, was Re: QC "Certificate Overloading", Todd S. Glassey - ELN, Sun, 9 May 1999 08:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
QC "Certificate Overloading", Anders Rundgren, Sat, 8 May 1999 20:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
one more time on certificate extensions, Hoyt.Kesterson, Fri, 7 May 1999 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Russ Housley, Fri, 7 May 1999 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Stefan Santesson, Fri, 7 May 1999 03:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Rename Qualified Certificates?, Arne Nilsson, Fri, 7 May 1999 03:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Rename Qualified Certificates?, Hans Nilsson, Thu, 6 May 1999 23:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
A data certification server question., Parag Namjoshi, Thu, 6 May 1999 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
X.509 FPDAM available, Sharon Boeyen, Wed, 5 May 1999 20:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
mail delivery has stopped, edward sestak, Wed, 5 May 1999 18:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Stephen Kent, Tue, 4 May 1999 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 4 May 1999 10:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 4 May 1999 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Stephen Kent, Tue, 4 May 1999 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
RE: OSCP BIG BANG, Stephen Kent, Tue, 4 May 1999 09:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
RE: OSCP BIG BANG, Peter Sylvester, Tue, 4 May 1999 09:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
RE: OSCP BIG BANG, Michael Myers, Tue, 4 May 1999 08:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
RE: OSCP BIG BANG, Linn, John, Tue, 4 May 1999 08:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Peter Sylvester, Tue, 4 May 1999 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: OSCP BIG BANG, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 4 May 1999 02:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Summary from April X.509 meeting, Sharon Boeyen, Mon, 3 May 1999 05:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Summary from April X.509 meeting, Alan Lloyd, Sun, 2 May 1999 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf-pkix, Christopher Stacy, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 15:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Summary from April X.509 meeting, Sharon Boeyen, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf-pkix, Paul Hoffman / IMC, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Confirmation for subscribe ietf-pkix, Christopher Stacy, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 08:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 08:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Confirmation for subscribe ietf-pkix, Kurn, David, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Confirmation for subscribe ietf-pkix, Majordomo, Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
RE: OSCP BIG BANG, Michael Myers, Thu, 29 Apr 1999 09:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-08.txt, Internet-Drafts, Thu, 29 Apr 1999 05:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 29 Apr 1999 04:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 29 Apr 1999 03:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Minor typing error in RFC 2459, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 29 Apr 1999 03:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
RE: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Alan Lloyd, Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Peter Gutmann, Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
OSCP BIG BANG, Denis Pinkas, Wed, 28 Apr 1999 06:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Peter Sylvester, Wed, 28 Apr 1999 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Denis Pinkas, Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Re: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Paul Koning, Tue, 27 Apr 1999 08:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
EU Electronic signature directive - Latest version available, Stefan Santesson, Tue, 27 Apr 1999 06:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Moshe Litvin, Tue, 27 Apr 1999 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Stefan Santesson, Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Closure of the QC biometric issue, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 26 Apr 1999 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Comments on QC-parts of PKIX roadmap., Stefan Santesson, Mon, 26 Apr 1999 04:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Closure of the QC biometric issue, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 26 Apr 1999 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
RE: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Alan Lloyd, Sun, 25 Apr 1999 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
subj.alt.name and uniqueness, sankar ramamoorthi, Sat, 24 Apr 1999 01:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Some term ambiguous on PKIX Roadmap, Alfred Arsenault, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
RE: New CMC Draft available - Confirmation Message, Bob Jueneman, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Bob Jueneman, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Re: WG Last call, redux, Stephen Kent, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
RE: New CMC Draft available - Confirmation Message, Jim Schaad (Exchange), Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Paul Koning, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 07:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Final Call for Papers - CQRE [Secure] networking, Detlef H�hnlein, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 06:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Time-Stamp: Why not use several hashes?, Peter Sylvester, Fri, 23 Apr 1999 05:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
sample PKIX message data ?, Xiong Shao Jun, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Some term ambiguous on PKIX Roadmap, �̵�ȣ, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
RE: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Stephen Kent, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 19:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Bob Jueneman, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Russ Housley, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Russ Housley, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: WG Last call, redux, Paul Hoffman / IMC, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
WG Last call, redux, Stephen Kent, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Ben Laurie, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 07:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 06:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 04:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Juergen Walter, Thu, 22 Apr 1999 02:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Bob Jueneman, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Francois Rousseau, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, David P. Kemp, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, David P. Kemp, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Russ Housley, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 09:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Juergen Walter, Wed, 21 Apr 1999 09:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Bob Jueneman, Tue, 20 Apr 1999 18:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
RE: SEIS: Re: Certificates, Directories, and Distinguished Names, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 20 Apr 1999 17:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
RE: CA vs. EE cert processing, Alan Lloyd, Tue, 20 Apr 1999 17:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Russ Housley, Tue, 20 Apr 1999 11:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Peter Williams, Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Stephen Kent, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 19:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, David P. Kemp, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 15:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Re: Delta CRL processing, Russ Housley, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: CA vs. EE cert processing, Moshe Litvin, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
RE: Delta CRL processing, Santosh Chokhani, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 09:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Re: CA vs. EE cert processing, Russ Housley, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 09:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Delta CRL processing, David P. Kemp, Mon, 19 Apr 1999 08:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: CA vs. EE cert processing, Moshe Litvin, Sun, 18 Apr 1999 02:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
RE: CA vs. EE cert processing, Alan Lloyd, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 22:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Peter Williams, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 18:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Peter Williams, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Stephen Kent, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 16:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Stephen Kent, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 15:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
RE: New CMC Draft available - Confirmation Message, Bob Jueneman, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 15:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Stephen Kent, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Re: New proposed solution to the QC biometric issue, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 16 Apr 1999 03:17:09 -0700 (PDT)

Page 5 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.