Archive of ietf-pkix/old-archive-99, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-pkix/old-archive-99

Page 1 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

unsubscribe, Jean-Rene.Labarriere, Fri, 31 Dec 1999 03:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Re: Bridge Certification Authorities, Sam Schaen, Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Bridge Certification Authorities, Snow Katrina, Thu, 30 Dec 1999 11:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Re: Getting an OID, Paul Hoffman / IMC, Thu, 30 Dec 1999 08:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Getting an OID, Bruschi Danilo, Thu, 30 Dec 1999 06:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Announcement of the Internet Spatial Location Forum, haitao.tang, Thu, 30 Dec 1999 04:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: Certificate Extension, Stephen Kent, Wed, 29 Dec 1999 07:14:17 -0800 (PST)
Certificate Extension, Floridia Carmelo, Wed, 29 Dec 1999 03:55:08 -0800 (PST)
Help PKIX schedule, Jorge G., Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:12:34 -0800 (PST)
confirm, Ricky Charlet, Tue, 28 Dec 1999 13:27:03 -0800 (PST)
RE: AC509 Login Name, Peter Williams, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 10:52:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: AC509 Login Name, Nick Pope, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:19:41 -0800 (PST)
RE: Time-stamp server. TimePrecision info, Sweigert, David, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 06:25:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: AC509 Login Name, Kensaku Masuda, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 04:37:09 -0800 (PST)
Re: AC509 Login Name, Stephen Farrell, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 04:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Re: AC509 Login Name, Andy Dowling, Tue, 21 Dec 1999 01:10:13 -0800 (PST)
AC509 Login Name, Nick Pope, Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:49:05 -0800 (PST)
Sample source code for writing the HTTP/LDAP, Franklin Lee, Fri, 17 Dec 1999 14:09:32 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, Progressive Software Pvt Ltd, Fri, 17 Dec 1999 02:20:45 -0800 (PST)
RE: certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs, Hiroyuki Sakakibara, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:26:11 -0800 (PST)
[no subject], susan.shimota, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Internet Security Conference, Call for Papers, Abstracts, Dave Piscitello, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:33:35 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, LUBREZ Jérôme, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 04:15:35 -0800 (PST)
CRLs' cycle, Pavel Krylov, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 02:22:20 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, LUBREZ Jérôme, Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Why should not the BC extension appear in end entity certificate?, Sungjin Lee, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Lynn.Wheeler, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 15:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, TMetzinger, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, TMetzinger, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 13:49:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Lynn.Wheeler, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:13:21 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Phillip M Hallam-Baker, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:37:07 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Bob Jueneman, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:38:45 -0800 (PST)
ISOC Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS 2000), David M. Balenson, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:48:40 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Phillip M Hallam-Baker, Wed, 15 Dec 1999 07:36:05 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, BalluffiF, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:00:24 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, John C. Kennedy, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 18:18:48 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Mike Davis, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 18:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 18:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Aram Perez, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, TMetzinger, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:19:32 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Stephen Kent, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:07:07 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Stephen Kent, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:07:03 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, Lynn.Wheeler, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 12:40:59 -0800 (PST)
RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, John C. Kennedy, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: cert == crl, Pavel Krylov, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Re: Shifting around the risk burden, Re:, Ed Gerck, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:01:33 -0800 (PST)
RE: cert == crl, Tom Biskupic, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: cert == crl, Pavel Krylov, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 04:45:01 -0800 (PST)
RE: cert == crl, Tom Biskupic, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 04:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: cert == crl, Pavel Krylov, Tue, 14 Dec 1999 02:28:17 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs, Peter Williams, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:29:25 -0800 (PST)
RE: certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs, Ambarish Malpani, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:50:57 -0800 (PST)
RE: Q: Are repeated OIDs allowed in the AIA extension?, Ambarish Malpani, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:08:11 -0800 (PST)
RE: Online PIN & Server Wallet, Lyal Collins, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 16:22:39 -0800 (PST)
RE: Online PIN & Server Wallet, Phillip M Hallam-Baker, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:33:59 -0800 (PST)
RE: Online PIN & Server Wallet, Lyal Collins, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs, David P. Kemp, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 08:40:25 -0800 (PST)
RE: Online PIN & Server Wallet, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:59:18 -0800 (PST)
DS, NR and their legal effects, Ed Gerck, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:24:39 -0800 (PST)
PKI Forum, Juan Rodriguez-Torrent, Mon, 13 Dec 1999 05:48:28 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC Bio-info leak?, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 23:49:05 -0800 (PST)
RE: certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs, Hiroyuki Sakakibara, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 17:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC Bio-info leak?, Lynn.Wheeler, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 17:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC Bio-info leak?, Lynn.Wheeler, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 16:03:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC Bio-info leak?, Lynn.Wheeler, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 15:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC Bio-info leak?, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 11:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC Bio-info leak?, Lynn.Wheeler, Sun, 12 Dec 1999 07:27:13 -0800 (PST)
QC Bio-info leak?, Anders Rundgren, Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Sat, 11 Dec 1999 06:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs, Ed Gerck, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:28:56 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Peter Williams, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 16:38:57 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll:Finger-printsin QCs, Stephen Kent, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:24:30 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Stephen Kent, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:24:13 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Stephen Kent, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:24:02 -0800 (PST)
RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question, MHenry, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 11:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Shifting around the risk burden, Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Ed Gerck, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:06:42 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Denis Pinkas, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:44:26 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Ed Gerck, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:46:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Ed Gerck, Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 9 Dec 1999 23:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 9 Dec 1999 23:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Subscription Request, Heidi Slominski, Thu, 9 Dec 1999 12:14:32 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Ben Laurie, Thu, 9 Dec 1999 01:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 15:30:08 -0800 (PST)
Re: Timestamping Standards., Daniel Alex Finkelstein, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 15:00:53 -0800 (PST)
CA Audit Post, Sweigert, David, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 14:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Re: cert == crl, Russ Housley, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:45:42 -0800 (PST)
cert == crl, Pavel Krylov, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 09:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: Q: Are repeated OIDs allowed in the AIA extension?, Russ Housley, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 08:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Re: certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs, Russ Housley, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 08:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Russ Housley, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 07:53:46 -0800 (PST)
RE: No, was Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 07:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Re: No, was Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 8 Dec 1999 06:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Re: No, was Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:59:51 -0800 (PST)
certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs, Hiroyuki Sakakibara, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 18:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Q: Are repeated OIDs allowed in the AIA extension?, Terry Hayes, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 17:12:18 -0800 (PST)
No, was Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Ed Gerck, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 15:29:19 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Peter Williams, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 15:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Aram Perez, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 14:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Re: Consensus Text for key usage?, Ed Gerck, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 14:47:47 -0800 (PST)
QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 13:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Re: Back to nothing: URI solution works?, Stephen Farrell, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 12:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Back to nothing: URI solution works?, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 12:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Consensus Text for key usage?, Tim Polk, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 12:23:59 -0800 (PST)
Re: back to nothing, was Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Stephen Farrell, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 12:12:22 -0800 (PST)
back to nothing, was Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Ed Gerck, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 11:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Aram Perez, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 09:45:27 -0800 (PST)
RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 07:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Re: Repeated: QC biometric selection/protocol, Denis Pinkas, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 06:22:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs, Stephen Kent, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 05:53:27 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 05:53:12 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Stephen Kent, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 05:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Repeated: QC biometric selection/protocol, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 04:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: The definition of OTHER-NAME, Magnus Nystrom, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 04:10:37 -0800 (PST)
The definition of OTHER-NAME, Tom Biskupic, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 03:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Stefan Santesson, Tue, 7 Dec 1999 02:21:22 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:46:51 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Ilan Shacham, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 21:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 20:17:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Williams, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 17:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Re: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Michael Sierchio, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 17:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Aram Perez, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 15:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, ghilborn, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 14:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 13:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Luther Martin, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 12:17:12 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 11:03:08 -0800 (PST)
Re: CRL Distribution Mechanism Evaluation and Considerations, Franklin Lee, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 05:05:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 04:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 02:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Denis Pinkas, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 02:43:34 -0800 (PST)
SEIS: RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, katarina.de-brisis, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 02:11:21 -0800 (PST)
RE: Internal conflict in QC profile?, Ilan Shacham, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Re: Internal conflict in QC profile?, Magnus Nystrom, Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:48:52 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 23:57:20 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Ilan Shacham, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 23:43:48 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Stephen Kent, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 20:05:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: CRL Distribution Mechanism Evaluation and Considerations, Franklin Lee, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 13:55:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC's - for human eyes only?, Eric Murray, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 09:01:06 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC's - for human eyes only?, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 05:56:03 -0800 (PST)
QC's - for human eyes only?, Ilan Shacham, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 04:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Internal conflict in QC profile?, Ilan Shacham, Sun, 5 Dec 1999 01:55:35 -0800 (PST)
CRL Distribution Mechanism Evaluation and Considerations, Franklin Lee, Sat, 4 Dec 1999 20:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 20:29:02 -0800 (PST)
TSP 4: socket protocol negPollRep message type, Lewis McCarthy, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:52:28 -0800 (PST)
RE: Certificates with DSA keys, Jim Schaad (Exchange), Fri, 3 Dec 1999 14:33:43 -0800 (PST)
RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Williams, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 12:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 12:18:16 -0800 (PST)
RE: Certificates with DSA keys, BalluffiF, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 05:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Stefan Santesson, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 05:12:43 -0800 (PST)
Certificates with DSA keys, Johannes Farmer, Fri, 3 Dec 1999 00:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tim Polk, Thu, 2 Dec 1999 07:09:24 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., David P. Kemp, Thu, 2 Dec 1999 07:05:45 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, Harald Giehl, Thu, 2 Dec 1999 02:21:47 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:35:20 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Paul Hoffman / IMC, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Russ Housley, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 11:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 10:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 10:39:17 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Sharon Boeyen, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 10:00:45 -0800 (PST)
[no subject], todd.glassey, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tim Polk, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 08:12:56 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, tgindin, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:51:39 -0800 (PST)
TISC Call for Papers, Dave Piscitello, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 07:29:50 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Anders Rundgren, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 02:21:20 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 01:51:24 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Stefan Santesson, Wed, 1 Dec 1999 01:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Anders Rundgren, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:48:51 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Anders Rundgren, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 19:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Re: Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:19:36 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:12:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:33:24 -0800 (PST)
RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Stefan Santesson, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., David P. Kemp, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:48:25 -0800 (PST)
RE: Unknown private verisign extension, Alex Deacon, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:01:17 -0800 (PST)
RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Linn, John, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 08:33:48 -0800 (PST)
RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tim Polk, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., John Saylor, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 06:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Stefan Santesson, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 04:38:47 -0800 (PST)
RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Williams, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 03:52:41 -0800 (PST)
RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Peter Williams, Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:33:41 -0800 (PST)
RE: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Anders Rundgren, Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:11 -0800 (PST)
RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Linn, John, Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Charles Moore, Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:19:41 -0800 (PST)
dnQualifier topic - not solved yet., Stefan Santesson, Mon, 29 Nov 1999 12:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 28 Nov 1999 00:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tim Polk, Fri, 26 Nov 1999 13:28:30 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Tim Polk, Fri, 26 Nov 1999 11:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Ed Gerck, Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:58:26 -0800 (PST)
RE: Question:Authority Information Access, Hiroyuki Sakakibara, Thu, 25 Nov 1999 04:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 25 Nov 1999 03:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 25 Nov 1999 02:51:11 -0800 (PST)
IPSec 2000, Peter Lewis, Thu, 25 Nov 1999 01:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Ed Gerck, Wed, 24 Nov 1999 14:36:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Aram Perez, Wed, 24 Nov 1999 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
proposed key usaged text -- the final round, Russ Housley, Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:42:39 -0800 (PST)
inhibitAnyPolicy extension, tomaz, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:34:13 -0800 (PST)
RE: Question:Authority Information Access, Khaja E. Ahmed, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:39:30 -0800 (PST)
Question:Authority Information Access, Hiroyuki Sakakibara, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Stefan Santesson, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:46:27 -0800 (PST)
RE: Unknown private verisign extension, Bill Price, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:25:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Peter Williams, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Re: Re: Certificate Policy vs Certification Practice .. where are the boundaries? ... what belongs where?, Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:50:14 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, John C. Kennedy, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Aram Perez, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:38:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Irene Gassko, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Eric Murray, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:18:19 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Aram Perez, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Tony Bartoletti, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, David P. Kemp, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:24:36 -0800 (PST)
signing entity in X.509, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 10:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Irene Gassko, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 09:08:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: Unknown private verisign extension, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, David P. Kemp, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Re: Unknown private verisign extension, Peter Gutmann, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:18:10 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, David P. Kemp, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:02:45 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Russ Housley, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Magnus Nystrom, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 05:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Jyri Tähtinen, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 04:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Jyri Tähtinen, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 03:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Juergen Brauckmann, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Magnus Nystrom, Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:00:01 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, Gary W. Seehousz, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:31:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, tgindin, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:35:23 -0800 (PST)
NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Peter Gutmann, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Paul Koning, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:31:28 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, ghilborn, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:07:26 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Anders Rundgren, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 13:40:14 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, John C. Kennedy, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:50:32 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Don Johnson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:23:44 -0800 (PST)
RE: proposed key usage text, Heimberg, Jim, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:19:35 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, John C. Kennedy, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:02:29 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:57:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:32:07 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Don Johnson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Irene Gassko, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:53:46 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:50:56 -0800 (PST)
DS and NR bit combinations, Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:47:55 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR-Bit Truth-In-Advertising, Tony Bartoletti, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:34:55 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Aram Perez, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Aram Perez, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:19:40 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Aram Perez, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, David P. Kemp, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:31:09 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:06:00 -0800 (PST)
RE: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Hans Nilsson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Russ Housley, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 07:29:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Don Johnson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 06:44:13 -0800 (PST)
Re: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Magnus Nystrom, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 04:39:41 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 03:42:55 -0800 (PST)
We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 03:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 02:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Stefan Santesson, Mon, 22 Nov 1999 01:45:13 -0800 (PST)
somewhat related timer discussion with geoplex, Lynn.Wheeler, Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:02:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, John C. Kennedy, Sun, 21 Nov 1999 13:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Re: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Ben Laurie, Sun, 21 Nov 1999 02:48:17 -0800 (PST)
RE: FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, John C. Kennedy, Sun, 21 Nov 1999 01:10:44 -0800 (PST)
FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other, Peter Gutmann, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 16:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 13:54:55 -0800 (PST)
MOTION ON NR, Ed Gerck, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 09:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Passage of Electronic Signature/Electronic Commerce Bill, TeamDaguio, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 08:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: Certifiedtime.com, Lynn.Wheeler, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 08:13:56 -0800 (PST)
PKIX compliance tests, Anne Anderson, Sat, 20 Nov 1999 07:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Re: NR-Bit Truth-In-Advertising, tgindin, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 19:31:14 -0800 (PST)
NR-Bit Truth-In-Advertising, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:50:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Marc Branchaud, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 16:14:27 -0800 (PST)
RE: Certifiedtime.com, Peter Williams, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: Certifiedtime.com, Todd Glassey @ GMTsw, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext, Al Arsenault, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Al Arsenault, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Al Arsenault, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Al Arsenault, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Marc Branchaud, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext, Ed Gerck, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Terry Hayes, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Marc Branchaud, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ben.King, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, tgindin, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Certifiedtime.com, Todd Glassey @ GMTsw, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:32:42 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, Jeffrey Hyman, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:22:00 -0800 (PST)
UNSUBSCRIBE, Jeffrey Hyman, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Lynn.Wheeler, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Aram Perez, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Russ Housley, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Russ Housley, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:20:01 -0800 (PST)
subscribe, Steve Cummings, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:13:17 -0800 (PST)
remove, Cam.F.Johnston, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 06:11:15 -0800 (PST)
ANSI X9.79 - CA Control Objectives., Khaja E. Ahmed, Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Al Arsenault, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Re: Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Al Arsenault, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Al Arsenault, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposedkeyusagetext, Stephen Kent, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:34:25 -0800 (PST)
RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Williams, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed keyusagetext, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed keyusagetext, Stephen Kent, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext, Stephen Kent, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:14:10 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, David P. Kemp, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:59:03 -0800 (PST)
usubscribe, Jeffrey Hyman, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:15:44 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:11:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 12:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:34:02 -0800 (PST)
RE: Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Peter Williams, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:06:34 -0800 (PST)
non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:56:11 -0800 (PST)
non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: Certificate Policy vs Certification Practice .. where are the boundaries? ... what belongs where?, Charles R. Merrill, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 07:59:34 -0800 (PST)
RE: Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Salz, Rich, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 07:09:40 -0800 (PST)
RFC 2527 Revision: What's going on and how to subscribe, torrent, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:34:16 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, David P. Kemp, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Re: Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Russ Housley, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:15:32 -0800 (PST)
RE: Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Sharon Boeyen, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 05:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 18 Nov 1999 00:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Re: Certificate Policy vs Certification Practice .. where are the boundaries? ... what belongs where?, Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:45:25 -0800 (PST)
RFC 2527 Revision: What's going on and how to subscribe, torrent, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 21:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Gutmann, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 19:25:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 18:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, tgindin, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Tony Bartoletti, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 15:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Re: correction, was Re: proposed key usage text, Peter Gutmann, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, tgindin, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Re: correction, was Re: proposed key usage text, tgindin, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:14:34 -0800 (PST)
Re: correction, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:30:24 -0800 (PST)
correction, was Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:10:42 -0800 (PST)
Should we make the cert Validity field optional?, Peter Gutmann, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Ed Gerck, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:21:01 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:51:05 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:41:17 -0800 (PST)
Re: proposed key usage text, Aram Perez, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:31:04 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Peter Williams, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:27:26 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Santosh Chokhani, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:23:00 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Paul Koning, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:48:04 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Peter Williams, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:28:28 -0800 (PST)
proposed key usage text, Tim Polk, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:45:02 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Stephen Kent, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Bob Jueneman, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:37:45 -0800 (PST)
Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Andrew Farrell, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:58:09 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Paul Koning, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Forward-dated entries in a CRL, Salz, Rich, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:27:45 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, David P. Kemp, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:17:22 -0800 (PST)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-generalname-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 03:58:04 -0800 (PST)
RE: PKIX: Use of dnQualifier must be settled, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:20:04 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:19:19 -0800 (PST)
RE: PKIX: Use of dnQualifier must be settled, Manger, James, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:36:10 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Stephen Kent, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:12:34 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:14:19 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Paul Koning, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:33:48 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier must be settled, Russ Housley, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 12:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Paul Koning, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 10:18:43 -0800 (PST)
RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Tue, 16 Nov 1999 09:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier must be settled, Ella Paton Bassett, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:33:32 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier must be settled, David Boyce, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:26:45 -0800 (PST)
Use of dnQualifier must be settled, Stefan Santesson, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 06:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Stephen Farrell, Tue, 16 Nov 1999 03:06:26 -0800 (PST)
RE: Licensed Certification Authorities in USA, Sweigert, David, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:39:37 -0800 (PST)
Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key, Trevor Freeman (Exchange), Mon, 15 Nov 1999 16:02:18 -0800 (PST)
Re: Timestamp: 04: comments, Stephen Kent, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 15:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Re: Extension Order, Ben Laurie, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Re: Extension Order, Peter Gutmann, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:29:40 -0800 (PST)
Extension Order, Scott, Greg, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier, David P. Kemp, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 07:40:22 -0800 (PST)
RE: ASN.1 question to PKIHeader in CMP (RFC 2510), Darren Harter, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 07:15:47 -0800 (PST)
RE: ASN.1 question to PKIHeader in CMP (RFC 2510), Salter, Thomas A, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 06:57:17 -0800 (PST)
FW: Check this out quickly and respond!, Luo, Feng (Exchange), Mon, 15 Nov 1999 06:50:23 -0800 (PST)
ASN.1 question to PKIHeader in CMP (RFC 2510), Anette Byskov, Mon, 15 Nov 1999 06:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: Timestamp: 04: comments, Todd Glassey @ GMTsw, Sat, 13 Nov 1999 17:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Unsubscribe, Cam.F.Johnston, Sat, 13 Nov 1999 11:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Stupid Q. re. PKCs and Directories, Anders Rundgren, Sat, 13 Nov 1999 01:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier, Anders Rundgren, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 23:39:22 -0800 (PST)
dnQualifier, Ella P. Gardner, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:45:30 -0800 (PST)
draft PKIX meeting minutes, Stephen Kent, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:43:59 -0800 (PST)
RE: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile, Anders Rundgren, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 10:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile, David P. Kemp, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 08:47:21 -0800 (PST)
RE: Model PKI Disclosure Statement (PDS), Farrukh Ahmad, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 05:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Unsubscribe, Bernard Hervault, Fri, 12 Nov 1999 00:14:26 -0800 (PST)
[no subject], Kirby Russell, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 21:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Use of dnQualifier in QC/2459 {Re: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile}, Anders Rundgren, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 20:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 20:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Re: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile, tgindin, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Re: Update of the QC personalData issue, Bob Jueneman, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: Update of the QC personalData issue, Marc Branchaud, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile, Stefan Santesson, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:12:00 -0800 (PST)
Re: dnQualifier is used incorrectly, Sean Turner, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 13:13:03 -0800 (PST)
unsubscribe, Cam.F.Johnston, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 06:22:34 -0800 (PST)
Policy Authority Control, Andy Dowling, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 04:20:26 -0800 (PST)
AC ASN.1, Andy Dowling, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 01:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Re: LAAP performance issues, Andy Dowling, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 00:59:38 -0800 (PST)
QC/Son-of-2459 "key-container-info", Anders Rundgren, Thu, 11 Nov 1999 00:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Static Identifiers {Re: Update of the QC personalData issue}, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Re: Model PKI Disclosure Statement (PDS), Ed Gerck, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:32:40 -0800 (PST)
dnQualifier is used incorrectly, Manger, James, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 18:49:54 -0800 (PST)
PKIX: employee/member/customer/org number attributes, Manger, James, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 18:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC container ID support, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Model PKI Disclosure Statement (PDS), Stefan Santesson, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Re: LAAP performance issues, Sean Turner, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 15:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Update of the QC personalData issue (errata), Stefan Santesson, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 15:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Update of the QC personalData issue, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:53:48 -0800 (PST)
QC container ID support, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:18:47 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Bill Brice (listserv), Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:33:29 -0800 (PST)
DOD Plans [was: Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459], schaen, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Stephen Kent, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 08:14:40 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Stephen Kent, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 08:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Stefan Santesson, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Stephen Kent, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:22:12 -0800 (PST)
IMPORTANT info for those who is staying in OMNI Shoreham. Please read., Michael Zolotarev, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, David P. Kemp, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 06:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Scruggs01, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 05:23:48 -0800 (PST)
RE: Timestamp: 04: comments, Simon Tardell, Wed, 10 Nov 1999 01:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 23:15:04 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Bob Jueneman, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 19:45:51 -0800 (PST)
RE: Licensed Certification Authorities in USA, Bob Jueneman, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 18:52:29 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Stephen Kent, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:00:40 -0800 (PST)
RE: Timestamp: 04: comments, Michael Zolotarev, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 13:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Anders Rundgren, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:42:34 -0800 (PST)
RE: Timestamp: 04: comments, Simon Tardell, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Re: Timestamp: 04: comments, Peter Sylvester, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Re: Timestamp: 04: comments, Paul Koning, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 07:17:30 -0800 (PST)
RE: Licensed Certification Authorities in USA, Russ Savage, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 06:49:35 -0800 (PST)
RE: Licensed Certification Authorities in USA, Sweigert, David, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 06:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Licensed Certification Authorities in USA, Sungjin Lee, Tue, 9 Nov 1999 03:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Stephen Kent, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:40:13 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC comparisons are DEADLY serious!, Stephen Kent, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-ac509prof-01.txt, Sean Turner, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 16:44:43 -0800 (PST)
Timestamp: 04: comments, Manger, James, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 16:12:13 -0800 (PST)
[no subject], Patterson, G. Shaun, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 11:33:32 -0800 (PST)
[no subject], Patterson, G. Shaun, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 10:06:12 -0800 (PST)
time-stamp ASN.1 module, Nick Pope, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: LAAP performance issues, Stephen Farrell, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 05:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-laap-00.txt, Stephen Farrell, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 05:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on ac509prof-01, Stephen Farrell, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 05:48:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: LAAP performance issues, Stephen Farrell, Mon, 8 Nov 1999 05:48:48 -0800 (PST)
Washington PKIX Agenda, Warwick Ford, Sun, 7 Nov 1999 14:55:12 -0800 (PST)
QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!, Anders Rundgren, Sun, 7 Nov 1999 06:34:30 -0800 (PST)
FYI: Announcement of a security requirements document for CAs, David A. Cooper, Sat, 6 Nov 1999 12:29:02 -0800 (PST)
RE: PKIX: String representation of GeneralName, Paul Koning, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 13:05:25 -0800 (PST)
RE: Last Call: Diffie-Hellman Proof-of-Possession Algorithms to Proposed Standard, Carlisle Adams, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:56:09 -0800 (PST)
FW: PKIX: String representation of GeneralName, Amit Kapoor, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
FW: PKIX: String representation of GeneralName, Amit Kapoor, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 12:40:19 -0800 (PST)
QC UID support must depart from RFC2459, Anders Rundgren, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:28:46 -0800 (PST)
RE: Possible patent issue with UTCTime hack, Scott Cadzow, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 08:14:05 -0800 (PST)
RE: Possible patent issue with UTCTime hack, Phillip M Hallam-Baker, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 08:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Agenda for wg, Mike Williams, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 06:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on ETNRT, Parag Namjoshi, Fri, 5 Nov 1999 05:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Real Life Example - RFC822 in a mergered firm, Mack Hicks, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:01:37 -0800 (PST)
RE: Comparing rfc822 addresses to certificates, Greg Colla, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:45:26 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC certificates and Nationality, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 11:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Comparing rfc822 addresses to certificates, Bob Jueneman, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:35:15 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC certificates and Nationality, Peter Gutmann, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:00:08 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC certificates and Nationality, David P. Kemp, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 09:32:39 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC certificates and Nationality, Bob Jueneman, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 08:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Re: How to identify certs to users, tgindin, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 08:17:02 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC certificates and Nationality, David P. Kemp, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 07:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on the PKIX Roadmap, Peter Sylvester, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 07:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Re: QC comparisons are DEADLY serious!, Peter Gutmann, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 06:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Comments on ETNPT, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 06:46:28 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on the PKIX Roadmap, Denis Pinkas, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 06:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Re: Comments on the PKIX Roadmap, Parag Namjoshi, Thu, 4 Nov 1999 04:29:07 -0800 (PST)
RE: QC comparisons are DEADLY serious!, Anders Rundgren, Wed, 3 Nov 1999 22:50:36 -0800 (PST)

Page 1 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.