[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio

To: "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio
From: Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 20:29:35 -0400
Cc: "Stephen Kent" <kent@xxxxxxx>, "Stefan Santesson" <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>, "'SEIS-List'" <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx

Anders,

>Initially PKI was about certs and global X500 directories - Did not happen
>
>Now it is zillions of certs distributed in various ways - Slow deployment
>
>So I do really believe there is room for a "third wave"

If the "third wave" does not match the PKIX model, you may wish to form a
WG to produces standards suited specifically to it.  The SPKI folks have
made space available.

Steve

References:
- Re: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio
  - From: Anders Rundgren

Prev by Date: Re: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio
Next by Date: RE: CA vs. EE cert processing
Previous by thread: Re: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio
Next by thread: RE: A $25,000,000,000 PKI Was:Spec. on QC-low-fat & QC-heavy-bio
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread