[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Low-fat leaf certificates

To: "'Denis Pinkas'" <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Low-fat leaf certificates
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:34:35 +0200
Cc: "'ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx'" <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx

Denis,
>Anders,

>Your E-mail got burried under hundred of other E-mails. Sorry for the delay to respond.

Nema Problema!

>You misunderstood my talk. I am advocating against numerous extensions to >certificates that could be
>handled generically by "administrative" certificates that contain information valid for a >large number of
>leaf certificates.

Unfortunately I did not had the opportunity to attend RSA99 so I did my own 
interpretation of low-fat leaf-certificates which obviously was wrong.

No chance to get my hands on some kind of document on that?

Regards
Anders

PS Below is my version/interpretation of low-fat DS

http://www.mobilephones-tng.com/papers/idcards.html

Prev by Date: RE: Time Stamp: tsa field in TSTInfo
Next by Date: RE: Time Stamping: comments on nonce field
Previous by thread: Re: Low-fat leaf certificates
Next by thread: Does it exist: CA certificate DP ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread