[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal

To: todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ambarish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
From: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 18:53:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx

I would like to understand what is fundamentally missing in a DCSToken
that you have in a BERT. (except some time expressed as a REAL). 

I would also like to understand what is fundamentally missing in a DCS request for cpkc
that is possible with SCVP (except some additional error codes). 

Regards

Peter Sylvester

Follow-Ups:
- RE: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
  - From: Ambarish Malpani

Prev by Date: Re: To Be, or NR To Be ...
Next by Date: Options, was Re: To Be, or NR To Be ...
Previous by thread: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-ldap-v3-01.txt
Next by thread: RE: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread