[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal

To: "'Peter Sylvester'" <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx>, <todd.glassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
From: "Ambarish Malpani" <ambarish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:11:27 -0700
Cc: <ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>

Hi Peter,
    What is cpkc?

Ambarish

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ambarish Malpani
Architect                                                650.567.5457
ValiCert, Inc.                                  ambarish@valicert.com
1215 Terra Bella Ave.                         http://www.valicert.com
Mountain View, CA 94043-1833


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Sylvester [mailto:Peter.Sylvester@EdelWeb.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 9:54 AM
> To: todd.glassey@www.meridianus.com; ambarish@valicert.com
> Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
> Subject: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real 
> issues are,
> and a proposal
> 
> 
> 
> I would like to understand what is fundamentally missing in a DCSToken
> that you have in a BERT. (except some time expressed as a REAL). 
> 
> I would also like to understand what is fundamentally missing 
> in a DCS request for cpkc
> that is possible with SCVP (except some additional error codes). 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Peter Sylvester
>

References:
- SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
  - From: Peter Sylvester

Prev by Date: Options, was Re: To Be, or NR To Be ...
Next by Date: Re: Subdividing the NR bit.
Previous by thread: SCVP-01 and A NEW WG - was Re: NR -- what the real issues are, and a proposal
Next by thread: [no subject]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread