RE: More problems with OCSP

[Alan Lloyd <Alan.Lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for the delay - can I ask what are you building this with?
Is an X.500 distributed system or LDAP servers - what are the backbone
features you are working with.

What reliability, ownership, DIT referential info and server
connectivity do you want. 

We have router DSAs etc that permit a range of backbone characteristics
(eg load balancing) - including interconnecting those free standing LDAP
servers.

I always try (in designing large scale directory systems)  address the
overall service issues, the capability requirements of the operational
directory system as input to the naming and schema strategy..Then make
this part of the operational design re DSA routers, DSA processes, DBs,
etc.

I am happy to discuss this off list.

regards (humble) alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sweigert, David 
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 25, 1999 8:28 AM
> To:	Alan Lloyd; 'pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz'; ambarish@valicert.com;
> ietf-pkix@imc.org
> Subject:	RE: More problems with OCSP
> 
> 
> As anyone grappling with the problem of defining a directory
> information
> tree for a multi-national company.  In other words, how do divisions
> in
> the UK and US relate in the DIT if both divisions are within one
> corporate
> organization; say MARKETING.
> 
> Would this be appropriate:
> 
> c=US
> o=GlobalCorp
> ou=Marketing
> 
> and
> 
> c=UK
> o=GlobalCorp
> ou=Marketing
> 
> 
> Any thoughts on this ?
> 
> Dave Sweigert