Re: Deprecate the NR bit?

[William Flanigan <flanigab@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now, this makes sense!  What do others feel?

Bob Jueneman wrote:

[snip]
> 
> My sense is that tempers are fraying, everyone's patience is wearing
> decidedly thin, and that the group is getting quite frustrated by the
> fact that we haven't been able to identify any single, reasonably
> simple definition for what we mean by NR.
> 
> If that is the case, I believe we should deprecate the NR bit within
> PKIX, and then charter another WG to explore the interaction between
> the certificate contents, application (as opposed to protocol) behavior,
> and the business and legal issues involved with signed documents.
> 
> Bob